Agricola, Georgius, De re metallica, 1912/1950

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 11]
[Figure 12]
[Figure 13]
[Figure 14]
[Figure 15]
[Figure 16]
[Figure 17]
[Figure 18]
[Figure 19]
[Figure 20]
[Figure 21]
[Figure 22]
[Figure 23]
[Figure 24]
[Figure 25]
[Figure 26]
[Figure 27]
[Figure 28]
[Figure 29]
[Figure 30]
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
< >
page |< < of 679 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <pb pagenum="xii"/>
            <p type="head">
              <s>AGRICOLA'S INTELLECTUAL ATTAINMENTS AND
                <lb/>
              POSITION IN SCIENCE.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>Agricola's education was the most thorough that his times afforded in
                <lb/>
              the classics, philosophy, medicine, and sciences generally. </s>
              <s>Further, his writings
                <lb/>
              disclose a most exhaustive knowledge not only of an extraordinary range of
                <lb/>
              classical literature, but also of obscure manuscripts buried in the public libraries
                <lb/>
              of Europe. </s>
              <s>That his general learning was held to be of a high order is amply
                <lb/>
              evidenced from the correspondence of the other scholars of his time—Erasmus,
                <lb/>
              Melanchthon, Meurer, Fabricius, and others.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>Our more immediate concern, however, is with the advances which were due
                <lb/>
              to him in the sciences of Geology, Mineralogy, and Mining Engineering. </s>
              <s>No
                <lb/>
              appreciation of these attainments can be conveyed to the reader unless he
                <lb/>
              has some understanding of the dearth of knowledge in these sciences prior
                <lb/>
              to Agricola's time. </s>
              <s>We have in Appendix B given a brief review of the
                <lb/>
              literature extant at this period on these subjects. </s>
              <s>Furthermore, no appreciation
                <lb/>
              of Agricola's contribution to science can be gained without a study of
                <emph type="italics"/>
              De
                <lb/>
              Ortu et Causís
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <emph type="italics"/>
              De Natura Fossílíum,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              for while
                <emph type="italics"/>
              De Re Metallíca
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              is of much
                <lb/>
              more general interest, it contains but incidental reference to Geology and
                <lb/>
              Mineralogy. </s>
              <s>Apart from the book of Genesis, the only attempts at funda­
                <lb/>
              mental explanation of natural phenomena were those of the Greek Philosophers
                <lb/>
              and the Alchemists. </s>
              <s>Orthodox beliefs Agricola scarcely mentions; with the
                <lb/>
              Alchemists he had no patience. </s>
              <s>There can be no doubt, however, that his
                <lb/>
              views are greatly coloured by his deep classical learning. </s>
              <s>He was in fine to a
                <lb/>
              certain distance a follower of Aristotle, Theophrastus, Strato, and other leaders
                <lb/>
              of the Peripatetic school. </s>
              <s>For that matter, except for the muddy current
                <lb/>
              which the alchemists had introduced into this already troubled stream,
                <lb/>
              the whole thought of the learned world still flowed from the Greeks. </s>
              <s>Had he
                <lb/>
              not, however, radically departed from the teachings of the Peripatetic school,
                <lb/>
              his work would have been no contribution to the development of science.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s>Certain of their teachings he repudiated with great vigour, and his
                <lb/>
              laboured and detailed arguments in their refutation form the first battle in
                <lb/>
              science over the results of observation
                <emph type="italics"/>
              versus
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              inductive speculation. </s>
              <s>To use
                <lb/>
              his own words: “Those things which we see with our eyes and understand
                <lb/>
              by means of our senses are more clearly to be demonstrated than if learned
                <lb/>
              by means of reasoning.”
                <emph type="sup"/>
              15
                <emph.end type="sup"/>
              The bigoted scholasticism of his times necessi­
                <lb/>
              tated as much care and detail in refutation of such deep-rooted beliefs, as would
                <lb/>
              be demanded to-day by an attempt at a refutation of the theory of evolution,
                <lb/>
              and in consequence his works are often but dry reading to any but those
                <lb/>
              interested in the development of fundamental scientific theory.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>In giving an appreciation of Agricola's views here and throughout the
                <lb/>
              footnotes, we do not wish to convey to the reader that he was in all things
                <lb/>
              free from error and from the spirit of his times, or that his theories, constructed
                <lb/>
              long before the atomic theory, are of the clear-cut order which that
                <lb/>
              basic hypothesis has rendered possible to later scientific speculation in these
                <lb/>
              branches. </s>
              <s>His statements are sometimes much confused, but we reiterate that </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>