Galilei, Galileo, De Motu Antiquiora

List of thumbnails

< >
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
< >
page |< < of 161 > >|
Now, if this demonstration has been grasped, the answer to these questions can easily be discerned.For it is clear that that the same mobile going down in different media, observes in the swiftness of its motions, the ratio to one another of the excesses of its own heaviness over the heavinesses of the media: thus if the heaviness of the mobile is 8, but the heaviness of a size of one medium, equal to that of the mobile, is 6, then the swiftness of this body will be 2; if the heaviness of an amount of the other medium, equal to the size of the mobile, is 4, then the swiftness of the mobile, in this medium, will be 4. It is therefore evident that these swiftnesses will be to one another as 2 and 4; and not as the thicknesses or the heavinesses of the media, which is what Aristotle wanted, which are to one another as 6 and 4. {1} Similarly the answer to the other question is evident : namely, what ratio the speeds of mobiles equal in size, but unequal in heaviness, observe with one another in the same medium. For the speeds of such mobiles will be to one another as the excesses by which the heavinesses of the mobiles exceed the heaviness of the medium: thus, for example, if two mobiles are equal in size, but unequal in heaviness, the heaviness of one being 8, and of the other 6, but the heaviness of an amount of the medium, equal in size to the size of one of the two mobiles, is 4, then the swiftness of the former mobile will be 4, and that of the latter will be 2. Hence these speeds will observe the ratio of 4 to 2; and not that which is between the heavinesses, namely 8 to 6. {1}And from all the things that have been conveyed here, it will not be difficult to apprehend also the ratio that will be observed by mobiles of different species in different media. For one should scrutinize what ratio the two observe, in swiftness, in the same medium; how this is to be done is evident from the preceding: {1} next, one should investigate what swiftness the other has in the other medium, also by means of what has been conveyed above: and we will have what is sought. Thus, for example, if there are two mobiles, equal in size, but different in heaviness, and the heaviness of one is 12, and of the other 8, and we seek the ratio between the swiftness of the one whose heaviness is 12, going down in water, and the swiftness of the one whose heaviness is 8, going down in air; let us see, first, how much faster 12 goes down in water than 8, next how much more swiftly 8 is carried in air than in water: and we will have what we are aiming at; or, alternatively, let us see how much more swiftly 12 goes down in air than 8, then how much more slowly the 12 is carried in water than in air.
Chapter 9 [274.1-276.23]

Search results

< >
Searching "tower" (fulltextMorph)
1. Page 16, Sentence 4:How ridiculous this opinion is, is clearer than daylight: for who will ever believe that if, for example, two lead balls were released from the sphere of the Moon, one being a hundred times larger than the other, if the larger took an hour to come to Earth, the smaller would use in its motion a space of time of a hundred hours? or, if from a high tower {1}, two stones, one being double the size of the other, were thrown at the same moment, that, when the smaller was at mid-tower, the larger would already have reached the ground?
2. Page 24, Sentence 18:For if one takes two different mobiles, which have such properties that one is carried twice as swiftly as the other, and then releases them from the top of a tower, it will certainly not hit the ground faster, twice as swiftly: what is more, if one makes the observation, the one which is lighter at the beginning of the motion will precede the heavier and will be faster.
3. Page 68, Sentence 9:But this way of thinking is not only false, but ridiculous: for, if it were true, it would follow that a stone going down from a very high tower would be moved more slowly at mid-tower, than if the same stone were falling to the ground from a very low place, and for this reason the mobile [falling from a greater height] would also make a lesser impact.
4. Page 76, Sentence 3:There is a fourth well-known argument concerning a large stone going down from a tower, which will not be sufficiently blocked by a pebble impelled upward by force, so as to permit the pebble to be at rest for any time: hence surely the pebble will not be at rest at the ultimate point of its upward motion, and Aristotle notwithstanding, it will make use of the ultimate point for the two limits, namely of upward motion and of downward motion; and the ultimate instant is taken twice, namely, for the end of one time and for the beginning of the other.
5. Page 79, Sentence 4:Now in the case of heavier things, since a great amount of contrary force must be consumed in their descent, a greater time will be required for it to be consumed; in which time, since they are carried swiftly, they will descend a great distance: since we cannot avail ourselves of such great distances from which to release heavy things, it is not astonishing if the stone, released from merely the height of a tower, will seem to accelerate all the way to the ground; for this short distance and short time of motion are not sufficient to destroy the whole contrary force.
6. Page 84, Sentence 6:Yet experience shows the contrary: for it is true that wood at the beginning of its motion is carried more speedily than lead; but a little later the motion of lead is so accelerated that it leaves the wood behind, and, if they are released from a high tower, the lead gets ahead of it by a large distance: and I have often put this to the test. {1}
7. Page 134, Sentence 6:But if we go up a very high tower, on the top of which there is a bathtub, the same thing will happen to us when in it as if we were to go into the sea: for we will not be weighed down by the water, even though the latter, having air underneath it, is outside its proper place.
8. Page 150, Sentence 12:For if a stone goes down from a high tower, its swiftness seems always to be increased: yet this happens because the stone, in comparison /// with the medium through which it is carried, namely air, is very heavy; and since it goes away with an amount of impressed force as great as its heaviness, it assuredly goes away with a great impressed force, which the motion from the height of a tower is not sufficient to consume, so that the swiftness is always intensified all through the height of a single tower.

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Search results
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


Clear
  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index