Galilei, Galileo, De Motu Antiquiora

List of thumbnails

< >
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
< >
page |< < of 161 > >|
From this demonstration it is evident, first, how, as was said above, upward motion comes about from heaviness, but the heaviness of the medium, not of the mobile: second, the aim of our research is concluded. If then this piece of wood, for example, whose heaviness is 4, is carried upward in water, and the heaviness of an amount of water as great in size as the size of the wood is 6, then the wood will be carried with a swiftness of 2: but if, on the contrary, this same piece of wood is carried upward in a medium heavier than water, such that the heaviness of an amount of this second medium as great in size as the size of the wood is 10, then the wood will be carried upward in it with a swiftness of 6. But it was carried in the other medium with a swiftness of 2: hence these two swiftnesses will be to one another as 6 and 2, not as the heavinesses or the thicknesses of the media, as Aristotle wanted it, which are to one another as 10 and 6. Thus it is evident that, in all cases, the swiftnesses of the upward motions are to one another as the excess of heaviness of one medium over the heaviness of the mobile is to the excess of heaviness of the other medium over the heaviness of the same mobile. For that reason, if on the spot we want to know the swiftnesses of the same mobile in two media, let us take from each medium two amounts equal in size to the size of the mobile, and let the heaviness of the mobile be substracted from the heaviness of each one of the media; the remaining numbers will be to one another {2} as

Search results

< >
Searching "tower" (fulltextMorph)
1. Page 16, Sentence 4:How ridiculous this opinion is, is clearer than daylight: for who will ever believe that if, for example, two lead balls were released from the sphere of the Moon, one being a hundred times larger than the other, if the larger took an hour to come to Earth, the smaller would use in its motion a space of time of a hundred hours? or, if from a high tower {1}, two stones, one being double the size of the other, were thrown at the same moment, that, when the smaller was at mid-tower, the larger would already have reached the ground?
2. Page 24, Sentence 18:For if one takes two different mobiles, which have such properties that one is carried twice as swiftly as the other, and then releases them from the top of a tower, it will certainly not hit the ground faster, twice as swiftly: what is more, if one makes the observation, the one which is lighter at the beginning of the motion will precede the heavier and will be faster.
3. Page 68, Sentence 9:But this way of thinking is not only false, but ridiculous: for, if it were true, it would follow that a stone going down from a very high tower would be moved more slowly at mid-tower, than if the same stone were falling to the ground from a very low place, and for this reason the mobile [falling from a greater height] would also make a lesser impact.
4. Page 76, Sentence 3:There is a fourth well-known argument concerning a large stone going down from a tower, which will not be sufficiently blocked by a pebble impelled upward by force, so as to permit the pebble to be at rest for any time: hence surely the pebble will not be at rest at the ultimate point of its upward motion, and Aristotle notwithstanding, it will make use of the ultimate point for the two limits, namely of upward motion and of downward motion; and the ultimate instant is taken twice, namely, for the end of one time and for the beginning of the other.
5. Page 79, Sentence 4:Now in the case of heavier things, since a great amount of contrary force must be consumed in their descent, a greater time will be required for it to be consumed; in which time, since they are carried swiftly, they will descend a great distance: since we cannot avail ourselves of such great distances from which to release heavy things, it is not astonishing if the stone, released from merely the height of a tower, will seem to accelerate all the way to the ground; for this short distance and short time of motion are not sufficient to destroy the whole contrary force.
6. Page 84, Sentence 6:Yet experience shows the contrary: for it is true that wood at the beginning of its motion is carried more speedily than lead; but a little later the motion of lead is so accelerated that it leaves the wood behind, and, if they are released from a high tower, the lead gets ahead of it by a large distance: and I have often put this to the test. {1}
7. Page 134, Sentence 6:But if we go up a very high tower, on the top of which there is a bathtub, the same thing will happen to us when in it as if we were to go into the sea: for we will not be weighed down by the water, even though the latter, having air underneath it, is outside its proper place.
8. Page 150, Sentence 12:For if a stone goes down from a high tower, its swiftness seems always to be increased: yet this happens because the stone, in comparison /// with the medium through which it is carried, namely air, is very heavy; and since it goes away with an amount of impressed force as great as its heaviness, it assuredly goes away with a great impressed force, which the motion from the height of a tower is not sufficient to consume, so that the swiftness is always intensified all through the height of a single tower.

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Search results
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


Clear
  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index