Archimedes
,
Natation of bodies
,
1662
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 68
>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 68
>
page
|<
<
of 68
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
073/01/006.jpg
"
pagenum
="
335
"/>
equidiſtant from the point K, the Center of the World, which parts are G M,
<
lb
/>
M L, L F, F H, H E.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1129
"/>
* Or through.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>RIC. </
s
>
<
s
>I underſtand you very well, as to this particular: But tell me a little; he
<
lb
/>
ſaith that each of the parts of the Liquid is preſſed or repulſed by the Liquid that
<
lb
/>
is above it, according to the Perpendicular: I know not what that Liquid is that
<
lb
/>
lieth upon a part of another Perpendicularly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>NIC. </
s
>
<
s
>Imagining a Line that cometh from the Center of the Earth penetrating
<
lb
/>
thorow ſome Water, each part of the Water that is in that Line he ſuppoſeth to
<
lb
/>
be preſſed or repulſed by the Water that lieth above it in that ſame Line, and that
<
lb
/>
that repulſe is made according to the ſame Line, (that is, directly towards the
<
lb
/>
Center of the World) which Line is called a Perpendicular; becauſe every
<
lb
/>
Right-Line that departeth from any point, and goeth directly towards the Worlds
<
lb
/>
Center is called a Perpendicular. </
s
>
<
s
>And that you may the better underſtand me, let
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.073.01.006.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
073/01/006/1.jpg
"
number
="
1
"/>
<
lb
/>
us imagine
<
lb
/>
the Line KHO,
<
lb
/>
and in that
<
lb
/>
let us imagine
<
lb
/>
ſeveral parts,
<
lb
/>
as ſuppoſe RS,
<
lb
/>
S T, T V, V H,
<
lb
/>
H O. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſay,
<
lb
/>
that he ſup
<
lb
/>
poſeth that
<
lb
/>
the part V H
<
lb
/>
is preſſed by
<
lb
/>
that placed a
<
lb
/>
bove it, H O,
<
lb
/>
according to
<
lb
/>
the Line OK;
<
lb
/>
the which
<
lb
/>
O K, as hath been ſaid above, is called the Perpendicular paſſing thorow thoſe two
<
lb
/>
parts. </
s
>
<
s
>In like manner, I ſay that the part T V is expulſed by the part V H, ac
<
lb
/>
cording to the ſaid Line O K: and ſo the part S T to be preſſed by T V, according
<
lb
/>
to the ſaid Perpendicular O K, and R S by S T. </
s
>
<
s
>And this you are to underſtand
<
lb
/>
in all the other Lines that were protracted from the ſaid Point K, penetrating the
<
lb
/>
ſaid Water, As for Example, in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
K
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
G,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
K
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
M,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
K
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
L,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
K
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
F,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
K
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
E, and infinite others of the
<
lb
/>
like kind.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>RIC. Indeed,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Dear Companion,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
this your Explanation hath given megreat ſa
<
lb
/>
tisfaction; for, in my Judgment, it ſeemeth that all the difficulty of this Suppoſition
<
lb
/>
conſiſts in theſe two particulars which you have declared to me.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>NIC. </
s
>
<
s
>It doth ſo; for having underſtood that the parts E H, H F, F L, L M, and
<
lb
/>
MG, determining in the Circumference of the ſaid Circle are equijacent, it is an
<
lb
/>
eaſie matter to underſtand the foreſaid
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Suppoſition
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in Order, which ſaith,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
That it is
<
lb
/>
ſuppoſed that the Liquid is of ſuch a nature, that the part thereof leſs preſſed or thrust is re
<
lb
/>
pulſed by the more thruſt or preſſed.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
As for example, if the part E H were by chance
<
lb
/>
more thruſt, crowded, or preſſed from above downwards by the Liquid, or ſome
<
lb
/>
other matter that was over it, than the part H F, contiguous to it, it is ſuppoſed
<
lb
/>
that the ſaid part H F, leſs preſſed, would be repulſed by the ſaid part E H. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
thus we ought to underſtand of the other parts equijacent, in caſe that they be
<
lb
/>
contiguous, and not ſevered. </
s
>
<
s
>That each of the parts thereof is preſſed and repul.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>ſed by the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
L
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
iquid that lieth over it Perpendicularly, is manifeſt by that which was
<
lb
/>
ſaid above, to wit, that it ſhould be repulſed, in caſe the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
L
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
iquid be deſcending into
<
lb
/>
any place, and thruſt, or driven any whither by another.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>RIC. </
s
>
<
s
>I underſtand this Suppoſition very well, but yet me thinks that before
<
lb
/>
the Suppoſition, the Author ought to have defined thoſe two particulars, which
<
lb
/>
you firſt declared to me, that is, how we are to underſtand the parts of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
L
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
iquid
<
lb
/>
equijacent, and likewiſe the Perpendicular.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>