Galilei, Galileo
,
Discourse concerning the natation of bodies
,
1663
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 77
>
Scan
Original
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 77
>
page
|<
<
of 77
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
pagenum
="
424
"/>
but that the Winde oppoſite to the South may do the ſame, but only
<
lb
/>
affirmeth that the force of the Water prevailing over the
<
lb
/>
Wind, the Bark ſhall move towards the South: and ſaith no more
<
lb
/>
than is true. </
s
>
<
s
>And juſt thus when
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſaith, that the Gravity
<
lb
/>
of the Water prevailing over that by which the moveable deſcends to
<
lb
/>
the Bottom, ſuch moveable ſhall be raiſed from the Bottom to the
<
lb
/>
face alledgeth a very true Cauſe of ſuch an Accident, nor doth he
<
lb
/>
firm or deny that there is, or is not, a vertue contrary to Gravity, called
<
lb
/>
by ſome Levity, that hath alſo a power of moving ſome Matters up
<
lb
/>
wards. </
s
>
<
s
>Let therefore the Weapons of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Signor Buonamico
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
be directed
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1439
"/>
<
lb
/>
gainſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Plato,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and other
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ancients,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
who totally denying
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Levity,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and taking
<
lb
/>
all Bodies to be grave, ſay that the Motion upwards is made, not
<
lb
/>
from an intrinſecal Principle of the Moveable, but only by the
<
lb
/>
pulſe of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Medium
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and let
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and his Doctrine eſcape
<
lb
/>
him, ſince he hath given him no Cauſe of quarelling with him
<
lb
/>
But if this Apologie, produced in defence of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſhould ſeen
<
lb
/>
to ſome inſufficient to free him from the Objections and Arguments
<
lb
/>
produced by
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
againſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Plato,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and the other
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ancients,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
as if they
<
lb
/>
did alſo fight againſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
alledging the Impulſe of the Water
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1440
"/>
<
lb
/>
as the Cauſe of the ſwimming of ſome Bodies leſs grave than it, I would
<
lb
/>
not queſtion, but that I ſhould be able to maintaine the Doctrine of
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Plato
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and thoſe others to be moſt true, who abſolutely deny Levity,
<
lb
/>
and affirm no other Intrinſecal Principle of Motion to be in
<
lb
/>
tary Bodies ſave only that towards the Centre of the Earth, nor no
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1441
"/>
<
lb
/>
other Cauſe of moving upwards, ſpeaking of that which hath the
<
lb
/>
ſemblance of natural Motion, but only the repulſe of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Medium,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſluid,
<
lb
/>
and exceeding the Gravity of the Moveable: and as to the Reaſons
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
on the contrary, I believe that I could be able fully to
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1442
"/>
<
lb
/>
anſwer them, and I would aſſay to do it, if it were abſolutely
<
lb
/>
ry to the preſent Matter, or were it not too long a Digreſſion for this
<
lb
/>
ſhort Treatiſe. </
s
>
<
s
>I will only ſay, that if there were in ſome of our
<
lb
/>
mentary Bodies an Intrinſecall Principle and Naturall Inclination
<
lb
/>
to ſhun the Centre of the Earth, and to move towards the Concave
<
lb
/>
of the Moon, ſuch Bodies, without doubt, would more ſwiftly aſcend
<
lb
/>
through thoſe
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Mediums
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that leaſt oppoſe the Velocity of the Moveable,
<
lb
/>
and theſe are the more tenuous and ſubtle; as is, for example, the
<
lb
/>
Air in compariſon of the Water, we daily proving that we can with
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1443
"/>
<
lb
/>
farre more expeditious Velocity move a Hand or a Board to and
<
lb
/>
gain in one than in the other: nevertheleſs, we never could finde any
<
lb
/>
Body, that did not aſcend much more ſwiftly in the water than in the
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1444
"/>
<
lb
/>
Air. </
s
>
<
s
>Yea of Bodies which we ſee continually to aſcend in the Water,
<
lb
/>
there is none that having arrived to the confines of the Air, do not
<
lb
/>
ly loſe their Motion; even the Air it ſelf, which riſing with great
<
lb
/>
lerity through the Water, being once come to its Region it loſeth all</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>