1ther built thereon. I deny not, that this which Ariſtotle hitherto
hath introduced, with a general diſcourſe dependent upon
ſal primary principles, hathbeen ſince in proceſs of time, re-inforced
with particular reaſons, and experiments; all which it would be
neceſſary diſtinctly to conſider and weigh; but becauſe what hath
been ſaid hitherto preſents to ſuch as conſider the ſame many and
no ſmall difficulties, (and yet it would be neceſſary, that the
mary principles and fundamentals, were certain, firm, and
ed, that ſo they might with more confidence be built upon) it
would not be amiſs, before we farther multiply doubts, to ſee if
haply (as I conjecture) betaking our ſelves to other waies, we may
not light upon a more direct and ſecure method; and with better
conſidered principles of Architecture lay our primary
tals. Therefore ſuſpending for the preſent the method of
tle, (which we will re-aſſume again in its proper place, and
cularly examine;) I ſay, that in the things hitherto affirmed by
him, I agree with him, and admit that the World is a body
ing all dimenſions, and therefore moſt perfect; and I add, that as
ſuch, it is neceſſarily moſt ordinate, that is, having parts between
themſelves, with exquiſite and moſt perfect order diſpoſed; which
aſſumption I think is not to be denied, neither by you or any
other.
hath introduced, with a general diſcourſe dependent upon
ſal primary principles, hathbeen ſince in proceſs of time, re-inforced
with particular reaſons, and experiments; all which it would be
neceſſary diſtinctly to conſider and weigh; but becauſe what hath
been ſaid hitherto preſents to ſuch as conſider the ſame many and
no ſmall difficulties, (and yet it would be neceſſary, that the
mary principles and fundamentals, were certain, firm, and
ed, that ſo they might with more confidence be built upon) it
would not be amiſs, before we farther multiply doubts, to ſee if
haply (as I conjecture) betaking our ſelves to other waies, we may
not light upon a more direct and ſecure method; and with better
conſidered principles of Architecture lay our primary
tals. Therefore ſuſpending for the preſent the method of
tle, (which we will re-aſſume again in its proper place, and
cularly examine;) I ſay, that in the things hitherto affirmed by
him, I agree with him, and admit that the World is a body
ing all dimenſions, and therefore moſt perfect; and I add, that as
ſuch, it is neceſſarily moſt ordinate, that is, having parts between
themſelves, with exquiſite and moſt perfect order diſpoſed; which
aſſumption I think is not to be denied, neither by you or any
other.
The circular line
perfect, according
to Ariſtotle, and
but the right
perfect, and why.
perfect, according
to Ariſtotle, and
but the right
perfect, and why.
The world is
poſed by the
thor to be perfectly
ordinate.
poſed by the
thor to be perfectly
ordinate.
SIMPL. Who can deny it? the firſt particular (of the worlds
dimenſions) is taken from Ariſtotle himſelf, and its
on of ordinate ſeems onely to be aſſumed from the order which it
moſt exactly
dimenſions) is taken from Ariſtotle himſelf, and its
on of ordinate ſeems onely to be aſſumed from the order which it
moſt exactly
Streight motion
impoſſible in the
world exactly
dinate.
impoſſible in the
world exactly
dinate.
SALV. This principle then eſtabliſhed, one may immediately
conclude, that if the entire parts of the World ſhould be by their
nature moveable, it is impoſſible that their motions ſhould be
right, or other than circular; and the reaſon is ſufficiently eaſie,
and manifeſt; for that whatſoever moveth with a right motion,
changeth place; and continuing to move, doth by degrees more
and more remove from the term from whence it departed, and
from all the places thorow which it ſucceſſively paſſed; and if
ſuch motion naturally ſuited with it, then it was not at the
ginning in its proper place; and ſo the parts of the World were
not diſpoſed with perfect order. But we ſuppoſe them to be
fectly ordinate, therefore as ſuch, it is impoſſible that they ſhould
by nature change place, and conſequently move in a right moti
conclude, that if the entire parts of the World ſhould be by their
nature moveable, it is impoſſible that their motions ſhould be
right, or other than circular; and the reaſon is ſufficiently eaſie,
and manifeſt; for that whatſoever moveth with a right motion,
changeth place; and continuing to move, doth by degrees more
and more remove from the term from whence it departed, and
from all the places thorow which it ſucceſſively paſſed; and if
ſuch motion naturally ſuited with it, then it was not at the
ginning in its proper place; and ſo the parts of the World were
not diſpoſed with perfect order. But we ſuppoſe them to be
fectly ordinate, therefore as ſuch, it is impoſſible that they ſhould
by nature change place, and conſequently move in a right moti
on. Again, the right motion being by nature infinite, for that
the right line is infinite and indeterminate, it is impoſſible that
any moveable can have a natural principle of moving in a right
line; namely toward the place whither it is impoſſible to arrive,
there being no præ-ſinite term; and nature, as Ariſtotle himſelf
ſaith well, never attempts to do that which can never be done,
zoom in
zoom out
zoom area
full page
page width
set mark
remove mark
get reference
digilib