Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/014.jpg
"
pagenum
="
8
"/>
if not ſo, then the ſuppoſion of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is defective. </
s
>
<
s
>It appears
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg21
"/>
<
lb
/>
moreover that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hinteth but one circular motion alone to
<
lb
/>
be in the World, and conſequently but one onely Center, to
<
lb
/>
which alone the motions of upwards and downwards, refer. </
s
>
<
s
>All
<
lb
/>
which are apparent proofs, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotles
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
aim is, to make white
<
lb
/>
black, and to accommodate
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Architectur
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to the building, and not
<
lb
/>
to modle the building according to the precepts of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Arthitecture:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
for if I ſhould ſay that Nature in Univerſal may have a
<
lb
/>
ſand Circular Motions, and by conſequence a thouſand
<
lb
/>
ters, there would be alſo a thouſand motions upwards, and
<
lb
/>
downwards. </
s
>
<
s
>Again he makes as hath been ſaid, a ſimple motion,
<
lb
/>
and a mixt motion, calling ſimple, the circular and right; and
<
lb
/>
mixt, the compound of them two: of natural bodies he calls ſome
<
lb
/>
ſimple (namely thoſe that have a natural principle to ſimple
<
lb
/>
tion) and others compound: and ſimple motions he attributes
<
lb
/>
to ſimple bodies, and the compounded to the compound; but by
<
lb
/>
compound motion he doth no longer underſtand the mixt of right
<
lb
/>
and circular, which may be in the World; but introduceth a mixt
<
lb
/>
motion as impoſſible, as it is impoſſible to mixe oppoſite motions
<
lb
/>
made in the ſame right line, ſo as to produce from them a motion
<
lb
/>
partly upwards, partly downwards; and, to moderate ſuch an
<
lb
/>
ſurdity, and impoſſibility, he aſſerts that ſuch mixt bodies move
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg22
"/>
<
lb
/>
according to the ſimple part predominant: which neceſſitates
<
lb
/>
others to ſay, that even the motion made by the ſame right line is
<
lb
/>
ſometimes ſimple, and ſometimes alſo compound: ſo that the
<
lb
/>
plicity of the motion, is no longer dependent onely on the
<
lb
/>
plicity of the line.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg20
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The Helix about
<
lb
/>
the Cylinder may
<
lb
/>
be ſaid to be a
<
lb
/>
ple line.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg21
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
modates the rules of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Architecture
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
to
<
lb
/>
the frame of the
<
lb
/>
World, and not the
<
lb
/>
frame to the rules.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg22
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Right motion,
<
lb
/>
times ſimple, ard
<
lb
/>
ſometimes mixt
<
lb
/>
cording to
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſt.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. How? </
s
>
<
s
>Is it not difference ſufficient, that the ſimple and
<
lb
/>
abſolute are more ſwift than that which proceeds from
<
lb
/>
nion? </
s
>
<
s
>and how much faſter doth a piece of pure Earth deſcend,
<
lb
/>
than a piece of Wood?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. Well,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; But put caſe the ſimplicity for this
<
lb
/>
cauſe was changed, beſides that there would be a hundred
<
lb
/>
ſand mixt motions, you would not be able to determine the
<
lb
/>
ple; nay farther, if the greater or leſſe velocity be able to alter
<
lb
/>
the ſimplicity of the motion, no ſimple body ſhould move with a
<
lb
/>
ſimple motion; ſince that in all natural right motions, the
<
lb
/>
ty is ever encreaſing, and by conſequence ſtill changing the
<
lb
/>
city, which as it is ſimplicity, ought of conſequence to be
<
lb
/>
table, and that which more importeth, you charge
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
with
<
lb
/>
another thing, that in the definition of motions compounded, he
<
lb
/>
hath not made mention of tardity nor velocity, which you now
<
lb
/>
inſert for a neceſſary and eſſential point. </
s
>
<
s
>Again you can draw
<
lb
/>
no advantage from this rule, for that there will be amongſt the
<
lb
/>
mixt bodies ſome, (and that not a few) that will move ſwiftly, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>