Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/016.jpg
"
pagenum
="
10
"/>
ther built thereon. </
s
>
<
s
>I deny not, that this which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hitherto
<
lb
/>
hath introduced, with a general diſcourſe dependent upon
<
lb
/>
ſal primary principles, hathbeen ſince in proceſs of time, re-inforced
<
lb
/>
with particular reaſons, and experiments; all which it would be
<
lb
/>
neceſſary diſtinctly to conſider and weigh; but becauſe what hath
<
lb
/>
been ſaid hitherto preſents to ſuch as conſider the ſame many and
<
lb
/>
no ſmall difficulties, (and yet it would be neceſſary, that the
<
lb
/>
mary principles and fundamentals, were certain, firm, and
<
lb
/>
ed, that ſo they might with more confidence be built upon) it
<
lb
/>
would not be amiſs, before we farther multiply doubts, to ſee if
<
lb
/>
haply (as I conjecture) betaking our ſelves to other waies, we may
<
lb
/>
not light upon a more direct and ſecure method; and with better
<
lb
/>
conſidered principles of Architecture lay our primary
<
lb
/>
tals. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore ſuſpending for the preſent the method of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
tle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(which we will re-aſſume again in its proper place, and
<
lb
/>
cularly examine;) I ſay, that in the things hitherto affirmed by
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg24
"/>
<
lb
/>
him, I agree with him, and admit that the World is a body
<
lb
/>
ing all dimenſions, and therefore moſt perfect; and I add, that as
<
lb
/>
ſuch, it is neceſſarily moſt ordinate, that is, having parts between
<
lb
/>
themſelves, with exquiſite and moſt perfect order diſpoſed; which
<
lb
/>
aſſumption I think is not to be denied, neither by you or any
<
lb
/>
other.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg23
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The circular line
<
lb
/>
perfect, according
<
lb
/>
to
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
lb
/>
but the right
<
lb
/>
perfect, and why.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg24
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The world is
<
lb
/>
poſed by the
<
lb
/>
thor to be perfectly
<
lb
/>
ordinate.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>Who can deny it? </
s
>
<
s
>the firſt particular (of the worlds
<
lb
/>
dimenſions) is taken from
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
himſelf, and its
<
lb
/>
on of ordinate ſeems onely to be aſſumed from the order which it
<
lb
/>
moſt exactly
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg25
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg25
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Streight motion
<
lb
/>
impoſſible in the
<
lb
/>
world exactly
<
lb
/>
dinate.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>This principle then eſtabliſhed, one may immediately
<
lb
/>
conclude, that if the entire parts of the World ſhould be by their
<
lb
/>
nature moveable, it is impoſſible that their motions ſhould be
<
lb
/>
right, or other than circular; and the reaſon is ſufficiently eaſie,
<
lb
/>
and manifeſt; for that whatſoever moveth with a right motion,
<
lb
/>
changeth place; and continuing to move, doth by degrees more
<
lb
/>
and more remove from the term from whence it departed, and
<
lb
/>
from all the places thorow which it ſucceſſively paſſed; and if
<
lb
/>
ſuch motion naturally ſuited with it, then it was not at the
<
lb
/>
ginning in its proper place; and ſo the parts of the World were
<
lb
/>
not diſpoſed with perfect order. </
s
>
<
s
>But we ſuppoſe them to be
<
lb
/>
fectly ordinate, therefore as ſuch, it is impoſſible that they ſhould
<
lb
/>
by nature change place, and conſequently move in a right moti</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg26
"/>
<
lb
/>
on. </
s
>
<
s
>Again, the right motion being by nature infinite, for that
<
lb
/>
the right line is infinite and indeterminate, it is impoſſible that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg27
"/>
<
lb
/>
any moveable can have a natural principle of moving in a right
<
lb
/>
line; namely toward the place whither it is impoſſible to arrive,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg28
"/>
<
lb
/>
there being no præ-ſinite term; and nature, as
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
himſelf
<
lb
/>
ſaith well, never attempts to do that which can never be done, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>