Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/028.jpg
"
pagenum
="
22
"/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg61
"/>
<
lb
/>
may be aſligned to the Univerſe, we ſhall rather find the Sun
<
lb
/>
placed in it, as by the ſequel you ſhall underſtand.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg59
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
It is queſtionable
<
lb
/>
whether deſcending
<
lb
/>
weights move in a
<
lb
/>
right line.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg60
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The Earth
<
lb
/>
cal by the
<
lb
/>
ration of its parts
<
lb
/>
to its Centre.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg61
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The Sun more
<
lb
/>
bably in the centre
<
lb
/>
of the Vniverſe,
<
lb
/>
than the Earth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Now, like as from the conſentaneous conſpiration of all the
<
lb
/>
parts of the Earth to form its whole, doth follow, that they with
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg62
"/>
<
lb
/>
equal inclination concurr thither from all parts; and to unite
<
lb
/>
themſelves as much as is poſſible together, they there ſphelically
<
lb
/>
adapt themſelves; why may we not believe that the Sun, Moon,
<
lb
/>
and other mundane Bodies, be alſo of a round figure, not by
<
lb
/>
ther than a concordant inſtinct, and natural concourſe of all the
<
lb
/>
parts compoſing them? </
s
>
<
s
>Of which, if any, at any time, by any
<
lb
/>
violence were ſeparated from the whole, is it not reaſonable to
<
lb
/>
think, that they would ſpontaneouſly and by natural inſtinct
<
lb
/>
turn? </
s
>
<
s
>and in this manner to infer, that the right motion agreeth
<
lb
/>
with all mundane bodies alike.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg62
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Natural
<
lb
/>
tion of the parts of
<
lb
/>
all the globes of
<
lb
/>
the World to go to
<
lb
/>
their centre.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. Certainly, if you in this manner deny not onely the
<
lb
/>
Principles of Sciences, but manifeſt Experience, and the Senſes
<
lb
/>
themſelves, you can never be convinced or removed from any
<
lb
/>
pinion which you once conceit, therefore I will chooſe rather to
<
lb
/>
be ſilent (for,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
contra negantes principia non eſt diſputandum
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
)
<
lb
/>
than contend with you. </
s
>
<
s
>And inſiſting on the things alledged by
<
lb
/>
you even now (ſince you queſtion ſo much as whether grave
<
lb
/>
ables have a right motion or no) how can you ever rationally
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg63
"/>
<
lb
/>
ny, that the parts of the Earth; or, if you will, that ponderous
<
lb
/>
matters deſcend towards the Centre, with a right motion;
<
lb
/>
as, if from a very high Tower, whoſe walls are vcry upright and
<
lb
/>
perpendicular, you let them fall, they ſhall deſcend gliding and
<
lb
/>
ſliding by the Tower to the Earth, exactly in that very place
<
lb
/>
where a plummet would fall, being hanged by a line faſtned above,
<
lb
/>
juſt there, whence the ſaid weights were let fall? </
s
>
<
s
>is not this a
<
lb
/>
more than evident argument of the motions being right, and
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg64
"/>
<
lb
/>
wards the Centre? </
s
>
<
s
>In the ſecond place you call in doubt,
<
lb
/>
ther the parts of the Earth are moved, as
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
affirms,
<
lb
/>
wards the Centre of the World; as if he had not rationally
<
lb
/>
monſtrated it by contrary motions, whilſt he thus argueth; The
<
lb
/>
motion of heavie bodies is contrary to that of the light: but the
<
lb
/>
motion of the light is manifeſt to be directly upwards, namely,
<
lb
/>
towards the circumference of the World, therefore the motion of
<
lb
/>
the heavie is directly towards the Centre of the World: and it
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg65
"/>
<
lb
/>
happens
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
per accidens,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that it be towards the centre of the Earth,
<
lb
/>
for that this ſtriveth to be united to that. </
s
>
<
s
>The ſeeking in the
<
lb
/>
next place, what a part of the Globe of the Sun or Moon would
<
lb
/>
do, were it ſeparated from its whole, is vanity; becauſe that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg66
"/>
<
lb
/>
by that is ſought, which would be the conſequence of an
<
lb
/>
bility; in regard that, as
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
alſo demonſtrates, the cœleſtial
<
lb
/>
bodies are impaſſible, impenetrable, and infrangible; ſo that ſuch </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>