Galilei, Galileo, The systems of the world, 1661

List of thumbnails

< >
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
< >
page |< < of 948 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="065/01/033.jpg" pagenum="27"/>
              diſtinct that can be poſſible; and excuſe me
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Sagredus,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              if haply
                <lb/>
              with ſome tediouſneſs you hear me oft repeat the ſame things,
                <lb/>
              and fancie that you ſee me reaſſume my argument in the
                <lb/>
              lick circle of Diſputations. </s>
              <s>You ſay Generation and
                <lb/>
              on are onely made where there are contraries; contraries
                <lb/>
              are onely amongſt ſimple natural bodies, moveable with contrary
                <lb/>
              motions; contrary motions are onely thoſe which are made by
                <lb/>
              a right line between contrary terms; and theſe are onely two,
                <lb/>
              that is to ſay, from the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              medium,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and towards the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              medium
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; and
                <lb/>
              ſuch motions belong to no other natural bodies, but to the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Earth,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Fire,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and the other two Elements: therefore Generation
                <lb/>
              and Corruption is onely amongſt the Elements. </s>
              <s>And becauſe
                <lb/>
              the third ſimple motion, namely, the circular about the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              medium,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              hath no contrary, (for that the other two are contraries, and one
                <lb/>
              onely, hath but onely one contrary) therefore that natural body
                <lb/>
              with which ſuch motion agreeth, wants a contrary; and having
                <lb/>
              no contrary is ingenerable and incorruptible, &c. </s>
              <s>Becauſe where
                <lb/>
              there is no contrariety, there is no generation or corruption,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              &c.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              But ſuch motion agreeth onely with the Cœleſtial bodies;
                <lb/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg81"/>
                <lb/>
              fore onely theſe are ingenerable, incorruptible,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              &c.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              And to
                <lb/>
              begin, I think it a more eaſie thing, and ſooner done to reſolve,
                <lb/>
              whether the Earth (a moſt vaſt Body, and for its vicinity to us,
                <lb/>
              moſt tractable) moveth with a ſpeedy motion, ſuch as its
                <lb/>
              lution about its own axis in twenty four hours would be, than it
                <lb/>
              is to underſtand and reſolve, whether Generation and Corruption
                <lb/>
              ariſeth from contrariety, or elſe whether there be ſuch things as
                <lb/>
              generation, corruption and contrariety in nature. </s>
              <s>And if you,
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Simplicius,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              can tell me what method Nature obſerves in working,
                <lb/>
              when ſhe in a very ſhort time begets an infinite number of flies
                <lb/>
              from a little vapour of the Muſt of wine, and can ſhew me which
                <lb/>
              are there the contraries you ſpeak of, what it is that corrupteth,
                <lb/>
              and how; I ſhould think you would do more than I can; for I
                <lb/>
              profeſs I cannot comprehend theſe things. </s>
              <s>Beſides, I would
                <lb/>
              ry gladly underſtand how, and why theſe corruptive contraries are
                <lb/>
              ſo favourable to Daws, and ſo cruel to Doves; ſo indulgent to
                <lb/>
              Stags, and ſo haſty to Horſes, that they do grant to them many
                <lb/>
              more years of life, that is, of incorruptibility, than weeks to theſe.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s>Peaches and Olives are planted in the ſame ſoil, expoſed to the
                <lb/>
              ſame heat and cold, to the ſame wind and rains, and, in a word,
                <lb/>
              to the ſame contrarieties; and yet thoſe decay in a ſhort time,
                <lb/>
              and theſe live many hundred years. </s>
              <s>Furthermore, I never was
                <lb/>
              thorowly ſatisfied about this ſubſtantial tranſmutation (ſtill
                <lb/>
              ing within pure natural bounds) whereby a matter becometh ſo
                <lb/>
              transform'd, that it ſhould be neceſſarily ſaid to be deſtroy'd, ſo
                <lb/>
              that nothing remaineth of its firſt being, and that another body </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>