Agricola, Georgius, De re metallica, 1912/1950

List of thumbnails

< >
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
< >
page |< < of 679 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb pagenum="xiii"/>
              their clarity is as crystal to mud in comparison with those of his predecessors—
                <lb/>
              and of most of his successors for over two hundred years. </s>
              <s>As an indication of
                <lb/>
              his grasp of some of the wider aspects of geological phenomena we reproduce,
                <lb/>
              in Appendix A, a passage from
                <emph type="italics"/>
              De Ortu et Causís,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              which we believe to be the
                <lb/>
              first adequate declaration of the part played by erosion in mountain sculpture.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s>But of all of Agricola's theoretical views those are of the greatest interest which
                <lb/>
              relate to the origin of ore deposits, for in these matters he had the greatest
                <lb/>
              opportunities of observation and the most experience. </s>
              <s>We have on page 108
                <lb/>
              reproduced and discussed his theory at considerable length, but we may repeat
                <lb/>
              here, that in his propositions as to the circulation of ground waters, that ore
                <lb/>
              channels are a subsequent creation to the contained rocks, and that they
                <lb/>
              were filled by deposition from circulating solutions, he enunciated the founda­
                <lb/>
              tions of our modern theory, and in so doing took a step in advance greater than
                <lb/>
              that of any single subsequent authority. </s>
              <s>In his contention that ore channels
                <lb/>
              were created by erosion of subterranean waters he was wrong, except for
                <lb/>
              special cases, and it was not until two centuries later that a further step in
                <lb/>
              advance was taken by the recognition by Van Oppel of the part played by
                <lb/>
              fissuring in these phenomena. </s>
              <s>Nor was it until about the same time that the
                <lb/>
              filling of ore channels in the main by deposition from solutions was generally
                <lb/>
              accepted. </s>
              <s>While Werner, two hundred and fifty years after Agricola, is
                <lb/>
              generally revered as the inspirer of the modern theory by those whose reading
                <lb/>
              has taken them no farther back, we have no hesitation in asserting that of the
                <lb/>
              propositions of each author, Agricola's were very much more nearly in
                <lb/>
              accord with modern views. </s>
              <s>Moreover, the main result of the new ideas
                <lb/>
              brought forward by Werner was to stop the march of progress for half a
                <lb/>
              century, instead of speeding it forward as did those of Agricola.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>In mineralogy Agricola made the first attempt at systematic treatment
                <lb/>
              of the subject. </s>
              <s>His system could not be otherwise than wrongly based,
                <lb/>
              as he could scarcely see forward two or three centuries to the atomic theory
                <lb/>
              and our vast fund of chemical knowledge. </s>
              <s>However, based as it is upon
                <lb/>
              such properties as solubility and homogeneity, and upon external character­
                <lb/>
              istics such as colour, hardness, &c., it makes a most creditable advance
                <lb/>
              upon Theophrastus, Dioscorides, and Albertus Magnus—his only predecessors.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s>He is the first to assert that bismuth and antimony are true primary metals;
                <lb/>
              and to some sixty actual mineral species described previous to his time he
                <lb/>
              added some twenty more, and laments that there are scores unnamed.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>As to Agricola's contribution to the sciences of mining and metal­
                <lb/>
              lurgy,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              De Re Metallíca
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              speaks for itself. </s>
              <s>While he describes, for the first
                <lb/>
              time, scores of methods and processes, no one would contend that they
                <lb/>
              were discoveries or inventions of his own. </s>
              <s>They represent the accumulation
                <lb/>
              of generations of experience and knowledge; but by him they were, for the
                <lb/>
              first time, to receive detailed and intelligent exposition. </s>
              <s>Until Schlüter's
                <lb/>
              work nearly two centuries later, it was not excelled. </s>
              <s>There is no measure by
                <lb/>
              which we may gauge the value of such a work to the men who followed in
                <lb/>
              this profession during centuries, nor the benefits enjoyed by humanity
                <lb/>
              through them.</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>