Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
61 49
62 50
63 51
64 52
65 53
66 54
67 55
68 56
69 57
70 58
71 59
72 60
73 61
74 42
75 63
76 65
77 65
78 66
79 67
80 68
81 69
82 70
83 71
84 72
85 73
86 74
87 75
88 76
89 77
90 78
< >
page |< < (97) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div274" type="section" level="1" n="60">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4134" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="97" file="0277" n="277" rhead="That the Eartb may be a Planet."/>
            ſtance from the Earth, and no nearer or far-
              <lb/>
            ther. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4135" xml:space="preserve">And beſides, this Argument might as
              <lb/>
            well be urged againſt the Hypotheſis of Pto-
              <lb/>
            lomy or Tycbo, ſince the Stars, for ought
              <lb/>
            we know, might have been as ſerviceable to
              <lb/>
            us, if they had been placed far nearer than
              <lb/>
            either of thoſe Authors ſuppoſe them. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4136" xml:space="preserve">A-
              <lb/>
            gain, were there any force in ſuch a Conſe-
              <lb/>
            quence, it would as well conclude a great
              <lb/>
            improvidence of Nature, in making ſuch a
              <lb/>
            multitude of thoſe leſſer Stars, which have
              <lb/>
            lately been diſcovered by the Perſpective.
              <lb/>
            </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4137" xml:space="preserve">For to what purpoſe ſhould ſo many Lights
              <lb/>
            be created for the uſe of Man, ſince his Eyes
              <lb/>
            were not able to diſcern them? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4138" xml:space="preserve">So that our
              <lb/>
            diſability to comprehend all thoſe ends
              <lb/>
            which might be aimed at in the Works of
              <lb/>
            Nature, can be no ſufficient Argument to
              <lb/>
            prove their ſuperfluity. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4139" xml:space="preserve">Though Scripture
              <lb/>
            tells us, that theſe things were made for
              <lb/>
            our uſe, yet it does not tell us, that this is
              <lb/>
            their only end. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4140" xml:space="preserve">’Tis not impoſſible, but that
              <lb/>
            there may be elſewhere ſome other Inhabi-
              <lb/>
            tants, by whom theſe leſſer Stars may be
              <lb/>
            more plainly diſcerned. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4141" xml:space="preserve">And (as was ſaid
              <lb/>
            before) why may not we affirm that of the
              <lb/>
            bigneſs, which our Adverſaries do concern-
              <lb/>
            ing the motion of the Heavens? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4142" xml:space="preserve">That God,
              <lb/>
            to ſhew his own immenſity, did put a kind
              <lb/>
            of infinity in the Creature.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4143" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4144" xml:space="preserve">There is yet another Argument to this
              <lb/>
            purpoſe, urged by Al. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4145" xml:space="preserve">Roſſ. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s4146" xml:space="preserve">which was
              <note symbol="*" position="right" xlink:label="note-0277-01" xlink:href="note-0277-01a" xml:space="preserve">Lib. I.
                <lb/>
              ſect. 2.6.I.</note>
            referred to any of the former kind, becauſe
              <lb/>
            I could ſcarcely believe I did rightly </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum