Galilei, Galileo, De Motu Antiquiora

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
< >
page |< < of 161 > >|
288 is to be thought more light than heavy. But this is the only thing I would conclude by their manner of arguing; if it is a good manner, let them see for themselves what is concluded: as for myself however I would say that the elements in their own places are neither heavy nor light.For if a portion of water in water were heavy, it would go down; which it does not: and if it were heavy, how, swimming in the deep, would we not feel the heaviness of such a vast size of water? To this they would answer: because the parts of water adhere to the parts below, as the bricks of the wall lean on the bricks below; whence, they say, it happens that the mouse which lives in a wall does not feel the weight of the stones. {1}As a matter of fact this comparison does not seem quite appropriate. For first they compare fluid and falling water to a solid and fixed wall: then, there is a sign that the bricks do not sit on the mouse's shoulder in that, when the mouse is taken away, the hole where the mouse was remains, and the bricks do not fall in it; but, when a fish or a man is taken out of water, the place where the man was does not remain, but is immediately filled with water, which indicates that water rests on the fish or the men. So that the whole explanation of the problem is as follows: we are said to be weighed down, when a certain weight which tends downward by its heaviness rests on us, and we need to resist by our force in order that it does not go down any further; now this resisting is what we call being weighed down.But since it has been demonstrated {1}, that bodies heavier than water, let down into water, go down, and are, indeed, heavy in water, but less heavy than in air; and it has been shown that things lighter than water, impelled by force under water, are raised upward; but that those that are equally as heavy as water are carried neither upward nor downward, but stay where they are placed, provided that they are completely under water; from this it is evident that if when we are under water a certain body heavier than water leans on us, such as a stone, we will indeed be weighed down, but less than if we were in air, since the stone in water is less heavy than in air: but if, staying in water, a body lighter than water is fastened to us, not only would we not be weighed down, but we would even be raised by it; as it is evident when swimming with a gourd, even though otherwise, being in air, we are weighed down by the gourd; this is because the gourd impelled into water is carried upward and lifts, but in air it is carried downward and exerts weight: now if when we are in water a certain body equally heavy with water hangs over us, we will not

Search results

< >
Searching "tower" (fulltextMorph)
1. Page 16, Sentence 4:How ridiculous this opinion is, is clearer than daylight: for who will ever believe that if, for example, two lead balls were released from the sphere of the Moon, one being a hundred times larger than the other, if the larger took an hour to come to Earth, the smaller would use in its motion a space of time of a hundred hours? or, if from a high tower {1}, two stones, one being double the size of the other, were thrown at the same moment, that, when the smaller was at mid-tower, the larger would already have reached the ground?
2. Page 24, Sentence 18:For if one takes two different mobiles, which have such properties that one is carried twice as swiftly as the other, and then releases them from the top of a tower, it will certainly not hit the ground faster, twice as swiftly: what is more, if one makes the observation, the one which is lighter at the beginning of the motion will precede the heavier and will be faster.
3. Page 68, Sentence 9:But this way of thinking is not only false, but ridiculous: for, if it were true, it would follow that a stone going down from a very high tower would be moved more slowly at mid-tower, than if the same stone were falling to the ground from a very low place, and for this reason the mobile [falling from a greater height] would also make a lesser impact.
4. Page 76, Sentence 3:There is a fourth well-known argument concerning a large stone going down from a tower, which will not be sufficiently blocked by a pebble impelled upward by force, so as to permit the pebble to be at rest for any time: hence surely the pebble will not be at rest at the ultimate point of its upward motion, and Aristotle notwithstanding, it will make use of the ultimate point for the two limits, namely of upward motion and of downward motion; and the ultimate instant is taken twice, namely, for the end of one time and for the beginning of the other.
5. Page 79, Sentence 4:Now in the case of heavier things, since a great amount of contrary force must be consumed in their descent, a greater time will be required for it to be consumed; in which time, since they are carried swiftly, they will descend a great distance: since we cannot avail ourselves of such great distances from which to release heavy things, it is not astonishing if the stone, released from merely the height of a tower, will seem to accelerate all the way to the ground; for this short distance and short time of motion are not sufficient to destroy the whole contrary force.
6. Page 84, Sentence 6:Yet experience shows the contrary: for it is true that wood at the beginning of its motion is carried more speedily than lead; but a little later the motion of lead is so accelerated that it leaves the wood behind, and, if they are released from a high tower, the lead gets ahead of it by a large distance: and I have often put this to the test. {1}
7. Page 134, Sentence 6:But if we go up a very high tower, on the top of which there is a bathtub, the same thing will happen to us when in it as if we were to go into the sea: for we will not be weighed down by the water, even though the latter, having air underneath it, is outside its proper place.
8. Page 150, Sentence 12:For if a stone goes down from a high tower, its swiftness seems always to be increased: yet this happens because the stone, in comparison /// with the medium through which it is carried, namely air, is very heavy; and since it goes away with an amount of impressed force as great as its heaviness, it assuredly goes away with a great impressed force, which the motion from the height of a tower is not sufficient to consume, so that the swiftness is always intensified all through the height of a single tower.

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Search results
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


Clear
  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index