Wilkins, John, A discovery of a new world : or a discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another Habitable World in the Moon ; with a discourse concerning the Probability of a Passage thither; unto which is added, a discourse concerning a New Planet, tending to prove, that 'tis probable our earth is one of the Planets

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
211 31
212 32
213 33
214 34
215 35
216 36
217 37
218 38
219 39
220 40
221 41
222 42
223 43
224 44
225 45
226 46
227 47
228 48
229 49
230 50
231 51
232 52
233 53
234 54
235 55
236 56
237 57
238 58
239 59
240 60
< >
page |< < (33) of 370 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="en" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div213" type="section" level="1" n="56">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2980" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="33" file="0213" n="213" rhead="That the Earth may be a Planet."/>
            with divers ſuch ſtories. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2981" xml:space="preserve">And 'tis ſcarce
              <lb/>
            credible, that this ſhould have been omitted
              <lb/>
            amongſt the reſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2982" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2983" xml:space="preserve">Nay, we have (as many gueſs) ſome
              <lb/>
            hints from prophane Antiquity, of the Mira-
              <lb/>
            cle wrought by Joſhua. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2984" xml:space="preserve">Unto which, ’tis
              <lb/>
            thought, the Ancients did allude, in the Fa-
              <lb/>
            ble of Phaëton, when the Sun was ſo irregu-
              <lb/>
            lar in his courſe, that he burnt ſome part of
              <lb/>
            the World. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2985" xml:space="preserve">And queſtionleſs then, this
              <lb/>
            whith hapned in later Times, would not
              <lb/>
            have been ſo wholly forgotten. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2986" xml:space="preserve">'Tis an Ar-
              <lb/>
            gument urged by Origen, That the
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0213-01" xlink:href="note-0213-01a" xml:space="preserve">* Tract it.
                <lb/>
              35. in Mat.</note>
            at our Saviour's Paſſion was not univerſal,
              <lb/>
            becauſe no prophane Author of thoſe times
              <lb/>
            mentions it. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2987" xml:space="preserve">Which Conſequence is the ve-
              <lb/>
            ry ſame with that which is urged in this
              <lb/>
            caſe: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2988" xml:space="preserve">But by the way, his Antecedent was
              <lb/>
            falſe, ſince Tertullian affirms, That it
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0213-02" xlink:href="note-0213-02a" xml:space="preserve">+ Apolog @.
                <lb/>
              cap. 21.</note>
            recorded among the Roman Annals.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2989" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2990" xml:space="preserve">Now, as for that ſtory in Herodotus, where
              <lb/>
              <note position="right" xlink:label="note-0213-03" xlink:href="note-0213-03a" xml:space="preserve">Lib. 2. A.</note>
            after he had related the flight of Senacherib,
              <lb/>
            he tells us, how the Sun did, four times in
              <lb/>
            the ſpace of 10340 Years, invert his courſe,
              <lb/>
            and riſe in the Weſt; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2991" xml:space="preserve">which would ſeem ſo
              <lb/>
            unto other Nations, if he had only returned,
              <lb/>
            as many conclude, from this Scripture. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2992" xml:space="preserve">As
              <lb/>
            for this ſtory, (I ſay) it cannot well be ur-
              <lb/>
            ged as pertinent to the preſent buſineſs, be-
              <lb/>
            cauſe it ſeems to have reference unto Times
              <lb/>
            that never were.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2993" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s2994" xml:space="preserve">So that all theſe things being well conſi-
              <lb/>
            dered, we ſhall find it more probable, </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>