Voltaire, Elémens de la philosophie de Neuton : mis à la portée de tout le monde

Table of Notes

< >
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
[Note]
< >
page |< < (270) of 430 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="fr" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div152" type="section" level="1" n="32">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3562" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="270" file="0294" n="295" rhead="DE LA PHILOSOPHIE"/>
            ne fût pas ſphérique, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3563" xml:space="preserve">cependant il eſt
              <lb/>
            prouvé, comme nous l’avons vu, que la
              <lb/>
            Terre ne peut avoir une forme entiére-
              <lb/>
            ment ſphérique; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3564" xml:space="preserve">il en eſt ainſi de la gravi-
              <lb/>
            tation.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3565" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3566" xml:space="preserve">Il n’y a pas à préſent de bon Phyſicien
              <lb/>
            qui ne reconnoiſſe & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3567" xml:space="preserve">la règle de Kepler, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3568" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            la néceſſité d’admettre une gravitation telle
              <lb/>
            que Neuton l’a prouvée; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3569" xml:space="preserve">mais il y a enco-
              <lb/>
            re des Philoſophes attachés à leurs tourbil-
              <lb/>
            lons de Matiere ſubtile, qui voudroient
              <lb/>
            concilier ces tourbillons imaginaires avec
              <lb/>
            ces Vérités démontrées.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3570" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3571" xml:space="preserve">Nous avons déja vu combien ces tour-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-0294-01" xlink:href="note-0294-01a" xml:space="preserve">Cette
                <lb/>
              gravita-
                <lb/>
              tion,
                <lb/>
              cette at-
                <lb/>
              traction,
                <lb/>
              peut ê.
                <lb/>
              tre un
                <lb/>
              premier
                <lb/>
              Principe
                <lb/>
              établi
                <lb/>
              dans la
                <lb/>
              Nature.</note>
            billons ſont inadmiſſibles; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3572" xml:space="preserve">mais cette gra-
              <lb/>
            vitation même ne fournit-elle pas une nou-
              <lb/>
            velle démonſtration contr’eux? </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3573" xml:space="preserve">Car ſuppoſé
              <lb/>
            que ces tourbillons exiſtaſſent, ils ne pour-
              <lb/>
            roient tourner autour d’un centre que par
              <lb/>
            les loix de cette gravitation même; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3574" xml:space="preserve">il fau-
              <lb/>
            droit donc recourir à cette gravitation,
              <lb/>
            comme à la cauſe de ces tourbillons, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3575" xml:space="preserve">
              <lb/>
            non pas aux tourbillons prétendus, comme
              <lb/>
            à la cauſe de la gravitation.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s3576" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>