418404DISSERTATIO11
Angulus E B A # 48 gr. 42?.
Angulus E A B # 25 gr. 15?.
Datur latus E B in XI Problemate # 2338, 2, 2.
Unde eruitur latus A E diſtantia inter Hagam & \\ Leidam # 4118, 0, 7.
Angulus E B A # 48 gr. 42?.
Angulus E A B # 25 gr. 15?.
Datur latus E B in XI Problemate # 2338, 2, 2.
Unde eruitur latus A E diſtantia inter Hagam & \\ Leidam # 4118, 0, 7.
XIV. Problema.
Eadem diſtantia inter Hagam & Leidam aliter tentata.
22 Tab. XV. fig. 12. Eſt angulus I A E obſervatus # 60 gr. 32?.
Angulus I E A # 104 gr. 32?.
Unde tertius A I E datur # 14 gr. 56?.
Latus A E intercapedo inter Leidam & Soeterwou- \\ dam eſt # 1097, 1, 017.
Atque ideo per Triangulorum doctrinam dabitur la- \\ tus A I # 4120, 8, 1.
In ſuperiori problemate eadem diſtantia deprehen- \\ ditur # 4118, 0, 7.
Adeoque eſt differentia # 2, 7, 4.
Quæ quidem parva eſt, attamen nulla debuerat deprehendi, quo- \\ niam hæc diſtantia baſis eſt plurium aliarum menſurarum, priori cal- \\ culo magis fidendum erit quam huic, ob exiguitatem anguli A I E. \\ ideoque in poſterum aſſumam diſtantiam inter Hagam & Lei- \\ dam eſſe # 4118, 0, 7.
XV. Problema.
Triangulum A E S nectens Leidam, Hagam, Goudam.
33 Tab. X V I. Datur A E diſtantia inter Hagam & \\ Leidam # 4118 0, 7.
Ex obſervatione datur angulus A E S # 97 gr. 11?.
Et angulus A S E # 32 gr. 25?.
Denique angulus E A S # 50 gr. 24?.
Hinc diſtantia inter Leidam & Goudam # 5918, 9, 7.
Inter Hagam & Goudam # 7621, 5, 6.