Apollonius <Pergaeus>; Lawson, John, The two books of Apollonius Pergaeus, concerning tangencies, as they have been restored by Franciscus Vieta and Marinus Ghetaldus : with a supplement to which is now added, a second supplement, being Mons. Fermat's Treatise on spherical tangencies

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
71 [vi]
72 [vii]
73 [viii]
74 [ix]
75 [x]
76 [xi]
77
78
79 [2]
80 [3]
81 [4]
82 [5]
83 [6]
84 [7]
85 [8]
86 [9]
87 [10]
88 [11]
89 [12]
90 [13]
91 [14]
92 [15]
93 [16]
94 [17]
95 [18]
96 [19]
97 [20]
98 [21]
99 [22]
100 [23]
< >
page |< < ([20]) of 161 > >|
97[20] rectangle EO, OQ is equal to the rectangle AE, IQ; conſequently, as the
ſum or difference of EO and OQ is alſo given, thoſe lines themſelves are
given by the 85th or 86th of the Data.
Synthesis. Take IQ a fourth proportional to R, S and P, and
deſcribe on EQ a circle;
erect at E the indefinite perpendicular EK, and
take therein ED a mean proportional between AE and IQ;
from D draw
DH, parallel to EQ, if O muſt lie any where between the points E and Q;
but through F, the center of the circle on EQ if it muſt fall without them,
cutting the ſaid circle in H:
Laſtly, draw HO perpendicular to DH, which
will meet the indeſinite line in O, the point required.
For it is manifeſt from the conſtruction that ED and HO are equal; and
(Eu.
VI. 17.) the rectangle AE, IQ is equal to the ſquare on ED, and
therefore equal to the ſquare on HO;
but the ſquare on HO is equal to the
rectangle EO, OQ (Eu.
III. 35. 36.) : therefore the rectangle AE, IQ is
equal to the rectangle EO, OQ;
and hence (Eu. VI. 16.) AE is to OE as OQ
to IQ, whence, by compoſition or diviſion, AO is to EO as OI to IQ;
but
IQ is to P as S to R, or inverſely, P is to IQ as R to S;
and ſo, by compound
ratio, the rectangle AO, P is to the rectangle EO, IQ as the rectangle IO,
R is to the rectangle IQ, S;
that is (Eu. V. 15 and 16.) the rectangle AO,
P is to the rectangle IO, R as EO is to S;
or the rectangle AO, P is to the
rectangle IO, R as the rectangle IO, EO is to the rectangle IO, S
(Eu.
V. 16.) the rectangle AO, P is to the rectangle EO, IO as the rectangle
IO, R is to the rectangle IO, S;
that is (Eu. V. 15.) as R is to S. Q. E. D.
Scholium. This Problem may be conſidered as having three Epitagmas,
or general Caſes, viz.
when A, the point which bounds the ſegment aſſigned
for the co efficient of the given line P being an extreme, O is ſought be-
tween it and the next thereto, or beyond all the points with reſpect to A;
ſecondly, where A is the middle point; and thirdly, when A being again
an extreme, O is ſought beyond it, or between the other two points E and
I:
and each of theſe is ſubdiviſible into four more particular ones.
Epitagma I. Here the four Caſes are when E being the middle point,
O is required between A and E, or beyond I;
and theſe are both con-
ſtructed at once by Fig.
9: when I is the middle point and O ſought between
A and I or beyond E;
and theſe are both conſtructed at once by Fig. 10.
and in both of theſe IQ is ſet off from I contrary to that direction which

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index