Biancani, Giuseppe
,
Aristotelis loca mathematica
,
1615
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 355
>
Scan
Original
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 355
>
page
|<
<
of 355
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003714
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
221
"
xlink:href
="
009/01/221.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
beat neceſſe eſt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003715
">& ſi triangulum ſecus, ita etiam, & quadratum commutabitur,
<
lb
/>
ex altera parte enim ei reſpondet. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003716
">& ſi quadratum quatuor angulis rectis æquales,
<
lb
/>
non habuerit angulos ne quidem triangulum duobus rectis habebit æquales)
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Hanc
<
lb
/>
trianguli affectionem, habere ſcilicet, ſuos tres angulos æquales duobus re
<
lb
/>
ctis angulis abundè explicaui libro 1. Priorum, ſecto 3. cap. 1. quam Eucli
<
lb
/>
des propoſit. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003717
">32. primi demonſtrauit, ex qua demonſtratione, tanquam ex
<
lb
/>
Geometrico principio ſequitur omne
<
expan
abbr
="
quoq;
">quoque</
expan
>
quadrangulum habere quatuor
<
lb
/>
angulos æquales quatuor rectis angulis; omne
<
expan
abbr
="
namq;
">namque</
expan
>
quadrangulum eſt po
<
lb
/>
tentia duo triangula, cum diuidatur ducta ipſius diametro in duo
<
expan
abbr
="
trìãgula
">trìangula</
expan
>
.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003718
">quod ſi triangulus proprietatem illam non haberet,
<
expan
abbr
="
neq;
">neque</
expan
>
hæc quadrangulo
<
lb
/>
conueniret. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003719
">& ſi quadrangulum non haberet quatuor angulos æquales qua
<
lb
/>
tuor rectis angulis, neque triangulum habere poſſet tres angulos æqua
<
lb
/>
les duobus rectis, cum nihil ſit aliud triangulum, quàm dimidiatum qua
<
lb
/>
drangulum.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003720
">
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg311
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.003721
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg311
"/>
320</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003722
">Cap. 16.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
(In Geometria ſi quidem cum quis dixerit quadrangulŭm quatuor rectis
<
lb
/>
æquales habere, & percunctatur propter quid, occurrit, quia etiam triangulŭm duo
<
lb
/>
bus rectis æquales habet. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003723
">in his igitur ex determinato ſibi principio propter quid
<
lb
/>
aſſumpſerunt)
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Lege, quæ proximè in præcedenti loco expoſui, ea enim om
<
lb
/>
nia huc etiam pertinent. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003724
">hoc ſolum addendum ad illorum verborum (
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ex de
<
lb
/>
terminato ſibi principio propter quid aſſumpſerunt
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) intelligentiam, ideſt ex vna
<
lb
/>
concluſione demonſtrata, tanquam principio alia demonſtrant; quod rectè
<
lb
/>
fieri Ariſt. in primo Poſter. docet.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003725
">
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg312
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.003726
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg312
"/>
321</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003727
">Cap. 31. (
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A qui proportionale in quatuor nihilominus perficitur: nam quem
<
lb
/>
admodum A, ad B, ita C, ad D.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) ideſt proportionalitas in quatuor terminis
<
lb
/>
conſiſtit, quemadmodum pluribus ſupra lib. 5. cap. 3. Ethycorum explica
<
lb
/>
tum eſt: quò nunc Lectorem ablego.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
head
">
<
s
id
="
s.003728
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ex primo Libro Moralium Eudemiorum.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003729
">
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg313
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.003730
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg313
"/>
322</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.003731
">Cap. 5 (
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vt ſi duplum multiplicium primum est, non licet multiplex com
<
lb
/>
muniter prædicatum ſeparari, quippe, quod duplo prius eſt
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) Inter pro
<
lb
/>
portionum genera vnum eſt, quod dicitur multiplex, quod ſub ſe
<
lb
/>
infinitas ſpecies continet, vt Duplum, Triplum, Quadruplum, & c.
<
lb
/>
in infinitum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003732
">vbi vides, cur Ariſt. dixerit duplum eſſe primum inter multi
<
lb
/>
plicia, cum verè naturali ordine numerorum ipſi primus debeatur locus.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.003733
">Vides etiam cur non liceat, Multiplex ipſum genus commune prædicatum
<
lb
/>
omnibus ſpeciebus veluti Idæam ſeparari; tunc enim ait, ipſum mul
<
lb
/>
tiplex abſtractum eſſet prius ordine ipſo primo multiplici, ſci
<
lb
/>
licet duplo; & Duplum non eſſet primum inter mul
<
lb
/>
tiplicia, quæ
<
expan
abbr
="
vtraq;
">vtraque</
expan
>
ſunt abſurda; non igitur
<
lb
/>
illud tanquam Idæam licet ſepa
<
lb
/>
ratum ponere.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>