Biancani, Giuseppe
,
Aristotelis loca mathematica
,
1615
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 355
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001228
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
66
"
xlink:href
="
009/01/066.jpg
"/>
hanc formam, dimidium duorum rectorum eſt rectus, angulus in ſemicir
<
lb
/>
culo eſt dimidium duorum
<
expan
abbr
="
rectorũ
">rectorum</
expan
>
, ergo angulus in ſemicirculo eſt rectus.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001229
">vides in minori propoſitione contineri definitionem ſubiecti materialem?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001230
">adeò vt hæc ſit demonſtratio omnibus numeris abſoluta per cauſam mate
<
lb
/>
rialem, vt benè ſentit Ariſt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001231
">Reliqua ad logicum pertinent, etiamſi per cha
<
lb
/>
racteres more mathematicorum exponantur.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001232
">
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg72
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.001233
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg72
"/>
72</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001234
">Tex. 24.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
(Vt propter quid reſonat? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001235
">aut propter quid apparet? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001236
">aut propter quid
<
lb
/>
Iris? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001237
">omnia enim hæc idem problemata ſunt genere, omnia enim ſunt refractio, ſed
<
lb
/>
ſpecie altera)
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
propter quid reſonat? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001238
">ſcilicet echo; propter quid apparet?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001239
">ſcilicet imago in ſpeculo. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001240
">dicit cauſam echo, imaginis in ſpeculo, & iridis
<
lb
/>
in nubibus eſſe eandem; nimirum refractionem; quamuis tres illæ refractio
<
lb
/>
nes, ſeu; vt melius loquamur, reflexiones differant ſpecie ab inuicem, illa
<
lb
/>
enim eſt repercuſſio vocis; hæc reflexio ſpeciei viſibilis ex corpore terſo;
<
lb
/>
iſta
<
expan
abbr
="
deniq;
">denique</
expan
>
radiorum Solis ex nube rorida in ſtato angulo repercuſſus. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001241
">qua
<
lb
/>
ratione autem iſta omnia fiant, longum eſſet exponere, & ab intelligentia
<
lb
/>
huius loci fortè alienum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001242
">Illud tamen non prætereundum, quod ſi propriè
<
lb
/>
cum Perſpectiuis loqui velimus, dicendum eſſe, omnia illa eſſe reflexionem,
<
lb
/>
non refractionem. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001243
">nam reflexio eſt, quando linea viſualis, per quam fertur
<
lb
/>
ſpecies in aliquod corpus terſum, impingit, ex quo deinde ad oculos refle
<
lb
/>
ctitur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001244
">refractio tunc eſt, quando ſpecies obiecti viſibilis tranſit per media
<
lb
/>
diuerſæ craſſitiei., vt quando ſpecies lapilli per aquam primùm, deinde per
<
lb
/>
aerem means ad oculum peruenit; tunc enim linea, per quam ſpecies pro
<
lb
/>
greditur, frangitur in confinio aquæ, & aeris, ita vt ſpecies non per vnicam
<
lb
/>
lineam rectam, ſed per fractam, ſeu refractam in confinio illo, oculis tan
<
lb
/>
dem accidat.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001245
">In fine textus
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
(Quoniam Luna deficit)
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
non intelligit defectum illum, qui
<
lb
/>
eclypſis appellatur, ſed ilium, quo paulatim lumen Lunæ minus oculis no
<
lb
/>
ſtris apparet: decreſcente enim Luna ſolent humida augeri.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001246
">
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg73
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.001247
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg73
"/>
73</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001248
">Tex. 25.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
(Vt propter quid, & permutatim proportionale? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001249
">& c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) quod quan
<
lb
/>
titates, quæ ſunt proportionales, ſint etiam alternatim, ſeu permutatim
<
lb
/>
proportionales explicatum eſt ad tex. 13. primi Poſter. quæ etiam neceſſa
<
lb
/>
ria ſunt ad hunc locum benè intelligendum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001250
">Illud autem commune propter
<
lb
/>
quod ea, quæ ſunt proportionalia, ſint etiam permutatim proportionalia,
<
lb
/>
eſt quoddam innominatum, de quo ibi dictum eſt, quod cum conueniat li
<
lb
/>
neis, & numeris, & tamen ſeparatim de vtriſque illa paſſio demonſtretur,
<
lb
/>
quærit cuinam primò, & per ſe conueniat hæc paſſio, eſſe permutatim pro
<
lb
/>
portionale; ſcilicet quidnam ſit illud innominatum; in quo deinde commu
<
lb
/>
nicent lineæ, & numeri, vt inde habeant eſſe etiam permutatim propor
<
lb
/>
tionalia.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001251
">
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg74
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
id
="
s.001252
">
<
margin.target
id
="
marg74
"/>
74</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001253
">Ibidem (
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hic quidem fortaſſe proportionaliter habere latera, & angulos
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) vult
<
lb
/>
indicare, in quonam conſiſtat ſimilitudo inter duas figuras rectilineas geo
<
lb
/>
metricas, quam ſimilitudinem Euclides definit. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001254
">1. ſexti, ſic explicat: ſimi
<
lb
/>
les figuræ rectilíneæ ſunt; quæ & angulos ſingulos, ſingulis angulis æquales
<
lb
/>
habent,
<
expan
abbr
="
atq;
">atque</
expan
>
etiam latera, quæ circa angulos æquales ſunt proportionalia.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001255
">vt ſi duo triangula appoſita habeant angulos æquales,
<
expan
abbr
="
angulũ
">angulum</
expan
>
A, angulo D:
<
lb
/>
angulum B, angulo E. angulum C, angulo F. & præterea latera, quæ ſunt </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>