Biancani, Giuseppe, Aristotelis loca mathematica, 1615

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 51]
[Figure 52]
[Figure 53]
[Figure 54]
[Figure 55]
[Figure 56]
[Figure 57]
[Figure 58]
[Figure 59]
[Figure 60]
[Figure 61]
[Figure 62]
[Figure 63]
[Figure 64]
[Figure 65]
[Figure 66]
[Figure 67]
[Figure 68]
[Figure 69]
[Figure 70]
[Figure 71]
[Figure 72]
[Figure 73]
[Figure 74]
[Figure 75]
[Figure 76]
[Figure 77]
[Figure 78]
[Figure 79]
[Figure 80]
< >
page |< < of 355 > >|
1leos imprudens me conieci? rident enim hoc Ariſt. dictum Mathematici,
putant enim eum pueriliter lapſum eſſe.
Cæterum ego pro præceptoris tu­
tela, dico eum ſequutum eſſe famam.
hæc Mazonius, quorum nonnulla in­
digent conſideratione cuiuſmodi, ſunt illa, quando dicit, neceſſarium vi­
detur, quod ea pars ſupra eam regionem attollatur, vnde Crepuſculum in
planitie apparere incipit.
videtur enim his verbis velle dicere, quod quan­
do habitantibus planitiem, quæ eſt ad pedem montis Caucaſi, vel horizon­
tem eiuſdem, incipit Crepuſculum, ijſdem etiam tunc tertia montis pars
appareat illuminata; in quo ſenſu errat poſtea in colligenda montis altitu­
dine, quamuis enim verum eſſet partem illuminatam eminere totam ſupra
52. milliaria, non tamen ſequitur ipſam ſolam eminere, ſed alia etiam pars
eminere poteſt, quod ſic geometricè demonſtrabo.
deſcribatur enim figura
53[Figure 53]

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index