Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Table of figures
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 331
[out of range]
>
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 331
[out of range]
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/1060.jpg
"
pagenum
="
366
"/>
<
figure
id
="
id.040.01.1060.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
040/01/1060/1.jpg
"
number
="
258
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For if it be poſſible, let it fall ſhort of it: and let R T be pro
<
lb
/>
longed as farre as to A C in V: and then thorow V draw V X pa
<
lb
/>
rallel to F D. Now, by the thing we have last demonſtrated, A X
<
lb
/>
ſhall have the ſame proportion unto A R, as A F hath to A E.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>But A S hath alſo the ſame proportion to A R: Wherefore
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(a)
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1226
"/>
<
lb
/>
A S
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
is equall to A X, the part to the whole, which is impoſſi
<
lb
/>
ble. </
s
>
<
s
>The ſame abſurdity will follow if we ſuppoſe the Toint
<
lb
/>
T to fall beyond the Line A C: It is therefore neceſſary that
<
lb
/>
it do fall in the ſaid A C. </
s
>
<
s
>Which we propounded to be demonstrated.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1226
"/>
(a)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 9. of the
<
lb
/>
fifth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
head
">
<
s
>LEMMA III.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Let there be a Parabola, whoſe Diameter
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1227
"/>
<
lb
/>
let be A B; and let the Right Lines A C and B D be ^{*} con
<
lb
/>
tingent to it, A C in the Point C, and B D in B: And two
<
lb
/>
Lines being drawn thorow C, the one C E, parallel unto
<
lb
/>
the Diameter; the other C F, parallel to B D; take any
<
lb
/>
Point in the Diameter, as G; and as F B is to B G, ſo let B
<
lb
/>
G be to B H: and thorow G and H draw G K L, and H E
<
lb
/>
M, parallel unto B D; and thorow M draw M N O parallel
<
lb
/>
to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A C,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and cutting the Diameter in O: and the Line
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
N P
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
being drawn thorow
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
N
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
unto the Diameter let it be parallel
<
lb
/>
to B D. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſay that H O is double to G B.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1227
"/>
* Or touch it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For the Line M N O cutteth the Diameter either in G, or in other Points: and if it do
<
lb
/>
cut it in G, one and the ſame Point ſhall be noted by the two letters G and O. </
s
>
<
s
>Therfore F C,
<
lb
/>
P N, and H E M being Parallels, and A C being Parallels to M N O, they ſhall make the
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.040.01.1060.2.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
040/01/1060/2.jpg
"
number
="
259
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Triangles A F C, O P N and O H M like to
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1228
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
each other: Wherefore
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(a)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
O H ſhall be to
<
lb
/>
H M, as A F to FC: and
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
^{*} Permutando,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1229
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
O H ſhall be to A F, as H M to F C: But
<
lb
/>
the Square H M is to the Square G L as the Line
<
lb
/>
H B is to the Line B G, by 20. of our firſt Book
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Conicks;
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
and the Square G L is unto the
<
lb
/>
Square F C, as the Line G B is to the Line B F:
<
lb
/>
and the Lines H B, B G and B F are thereupon
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1230
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Proportionals: Therefore the
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(b)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Squares
<
lb
/>
H M, G L and F C and there Sides, ſhall alſo be
<
lb
/>
Proportionals: And, therefore, as the (c)
<
lb
/>
Square H M is to the Square G L, ſo is the Line
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1231
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
H M to the Line F C: But as H M is to F C, ſo
<
lb
/>
is O H to A F; and as the Square H M is to
<
lb
/>
the Square G L, ſo is the Line H B to B G; that
<
lb
/>
is, B G to B F: From whence it followeth that
<
lb
/>
O H is to A F, as B G to B F: And
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Permu
<
lb
/>
tando,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
O H is to B G, as A F to F B; But A F is double to F B: Therefore A B and B F
<
lb
/>
are equall, by 35. of our firſt Book of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Conicks:
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
And therefore N O is double to G B:
<
lb
/>
Which was to be demonſtrated.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>