Castelli, Benedetto
,
Of the mensuration of running waters
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 137
>
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 137
>
page
|<
<
of 137
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
068/01/123.jpg
"
pagenum
="
109
"/>
time would be allowed, upon occaſion, to ſcowr and cleanſe
<
lb
/>
it.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>And in this manner all thoſe Prodigies vaniſh that are raiſed
<
lb
/>
with ſo much fear from the enterance of the Water of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſwelled into P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
when it is high, to which there needeth no other
<
lb
/>
anſwer; yet nevertheleſſe we do not take that quantity of Wa
<
lb
/>
ter, that is carried by
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and by
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Panaro,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to be ſo great as is affir
<
lb
/>
med: For that P. D.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Benedetto Caſtelli
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hath no leſſe accutely
<
lb
/>
than accurately obſerved the meaſures of this kind, noting that
<
lb
/>
the breadth and depth of a River is not enough to reſolve the
<
lb
/>
queſtion truly, but that there is reſpect to be had to the velocity
<
lb
/>
of the Waters, and the term of time, things hitherto not conſi
<
lb
/>
dered by the Skilful in theſe affairs; and therefore they are not
<
lb
/>
able to ſay what quantity of Waters the ſaid Rivers carry, nor
<
lb
/>
to conclude of the riſings that will follow thereupon. </
s
>
<
s
>Nay, it
<
lb
/>
is moſt certain, that if all the Rivers that fall into
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Po,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
which are
<
lb
/>
above thirty, ſhould riſe at the rate that theſe compute
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to
<
lb
/>
do, an hundred feet of Banks would not ſuffice, and yet they
<
lb
/>
have far fewer: So that this confirmes the Rule of R. P. D.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Bene
<
lb
/>
detto,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
namely, that the proportion of the height of the Water
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to the height of the Water of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is
<
lb
/>
compounded of the proportion of the breadth of the Chanel of
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Po
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to that of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and of the velocity of the Water of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Po
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to the velccity of the Water of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; a manifeſt
<
lb
/>
argument that there cannot in it, by this new augmentation of
<
lb
/>
Waters follow any alteration that neceſſitates the raiſing of its
<
lb
/>
Banks, as appeareth by the example of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Panaro,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
which hath been
<
lb
/>
ſo far from ſwelling P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that it hath rather aſſwaged it, for it hath
<
lb
/>
carried away many Shelfs and many Iſlets that had grown in its
<
lb
/>
Bed, for want of Waters ſufficient to bear away the matter of
<
lb
/>
Land-floods in ſo broad a Chanel; and as is learnt by the trial
<
lb
/>
made by us in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Panaro
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
with the Water of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Burana
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; for erecting
<
lb
/>
in the River ſtanding marks, and ſhutting the ſaid Sluice, we could
<
lb
/>
ſee no ſenſible abatement, nor much leſs after we had opened it
<
lb
/>
ſenſible increaſment; by which we judge that the ſame is to ſuc
<
lb
/>
ceed to P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
by letting in of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno, Burana
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
having greater pro
<
lb
/>
portion to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Panaro
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
to P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
conſidering the ſtate of thoſe
<
lb
/>
Rivers in which the Obſervation was made. </
s
>
<
s
>So that there is no
<
lb
/>
longer any occaſion for thoſe great raiſings of Banks, and the
<
lb
/>
danger of the ruptures as well of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Reno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
as of P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
do vaniſh, as al
<
lb
/>
ſo the fear leſt that the Sluices which empty into P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſhould re
<
lb
/>
ceive obſtruction: which if they ſhould, yet it would be over in
<
lb
/>
a few hours. </
s
>
<
s
>And as to the Breaches of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Panaro
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
which happened
<
lb
/>
in 1623. I know not why, ſeeing that it is confeſſed that the P
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
o
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
was not, at that time, at its height, one ſhould rather charge it </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>