Gassendi, Pierre, De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur, 1646

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
< >
page |< < of 360 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000776">
                <pb pagenum="83" xlink:href="028/01/123.jpg"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              audacter etiam affirmet ſe item eadem methodo expertum
                <lb/>
              eſſe spatia ęqualibus temporibus emenſa eam inter ſe ratio­
                <lb/>
              nem obſeruare, quæ inter numeros omneis impareis ab vni­
                <lb/>
              tate continua ſerie procedenteis inuenitur; & in hac tamen
                <lb/>
              poſteriore obſeruatione vehementer errauerit, magnoperè
                <lb/>
              verendum eſſe, ne in priore quoque non minùs hallucinatus
                <lb/>
              ſit.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000777"> Dicis deinde,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Satis non eſſe, ſi tempus habeatur, quo
                <lb/>
              prima quælibet pars deſignati spatij tranſmittitur, niſi tem­
                <lb/>
              pus quoque cognoſcatur, quo pars ſequens priori æqualis, vel
                <lb/>
              duæ medietates primę ſeorſim decurruntur; quod tamen
                <lb/>
              exactè determinare,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              inquis,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              per quam difficile arbitror, ob
                <lb/>
              cauſſas iam ſæpiùs adductas.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000778"> Et quænam quidem fue­
                <lb/>
              rint huiuſmodi cauſſæ non commemini; ſed interim
                <lb/>
              tamen candorem commendo, quo dicis Tertiò,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              te qua­
                <lb/>
              cúmque diligentia adhibita nihil habere potuiſſe, in quo in­
                <lb/>
              tellectus conquieſceret:
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ac author es; vt ſi aliquis ſe id
                <lb/>
              fœliciùs aſſequi poſſe confidat,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              turrim ſatis excelſam
                <lb/>
              eligat, puta
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              200
                <emph type="italics"/>
              pedum; ac deinde aliam altitudinem duplò
                <lb/>
              præcisè minorem, pedum videlicet centum; & ex vtraque
                <lb/>
              altitudine, tempus deſcenſus exactißimè inquirat; tum mino­
                <lb/>
              re tempore, ex maiore ſubducto, reſiduum daturum tempus
                <lb/>
              deſcenſus per turris maioris centum pedes infimos: tempus
                <lb/>
              verò illud minus, quo idem corpus ex ſola centum pedum al­
                <lb/>
              titudine deſcendet, ęquale tempori futurum, quo ex maiori
                <lb/>
              quoque altitudine, per centum pedes ſuperiores deſcenderit.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000779">XLVI. </s>
              <s id="s.000780">Ad primum porrò quod attinet; videtur
                <lb/>
              ſanè non ſatis idonea refutatio experimenti, quod
                <lb/>
              ille teſtatur ſe ſæpiùs, ac diligenter peregiſſe, niſi teſte­
                <lb/>
              ris temetipſum idem tentaſſe, peregiſſeque, ac fuiſſe
                <lb/>
              rem ſecùs à te obſeruatam, falſitatiſque adeò con-</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum