DelMonte, Guidubaldo, In duos Archimedis aequeponderantium libros Paraphrasis : scholijs illustrata

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 121]
Page: 193
[Figure 122]
Page: 193
[Figure 123]
Page: 194
[Figure 124]
Page: 197
[Figure 125]
Page: 205
[Figure 126]
Page: 205
[Figure 127]
Page: 205
[Figure 128]
Page: 205
< >
page |< < of 207 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N10019">
            <p id="N148BC" type="main">
              <s id="N148C4">
                <pb xlink:href="077/01/124.jpg" pagenum="120"/>
              ſtrauit. </s>
              <s id="N148D0">Ex quibus colligit Geminus (〈que〉m Eutocius, alijquè
                <lb/>
              complures ſecuti ſunt) eos, qui ante Apollonium extitere,
                <lb/>
              conostantùm rectos cognouiſſe. </s>
              <s id="N148D6">& in vnoquo〈que〉 cono
                <expan abbr="vnã">vnam</expan>
                <lb/>
              tantùm ſectionem animaduertiſſe. </s>
              <s id="N148DE">quod quidem ſi de ijs, qui
                <lb/>
              ante Archimedem fuere intelligatur; ad mitti fortaſſe poterit;
                <lb/>
              ac præſertim de Euclide. </s>
              <s id="N148E4">vt patet ex definitione coni abeo
                <lb/>
              tradita. </s>
              <s id="N148E8">At verò de Archimede, qui poſt Euclidem, ante verò
                <lb/>
              Apollonium fuit, non ita facilè concedendum videtur.
                <expan abbr="Nã">Nam</expan>
              ex
                <lb/>
              ijs, quæ ſcripta reliquit. </s>
              <s id="N148F2">eum non ſolùm notitiam ha-­
                <lb/>
              buiſſe de conis rectis; verùm
                <expan abbr="etiã">etiam</expan>
              de ſcalenis facilè ex i-­
                <lb/>
              pſius ſcriptis conijci poteſt. </s>
              <s id="N148FC">In primo enim librode ſphæ­
                <lb/>
              ra, & cylindro multis in locis, vt in ſeptima, octaua, no
                <lb/>
              na, decimaquarta, decimaquinta propoſitione; alijsquè in
                <lb/>
              locis conos nominat ęquicrures, quod quidem ſecundum i­
                <lb/>
              pſum ſunt, qui in eius ſuperficie æquales habent rectas lineas
                <lb/>
              à vertice coni ad baſim ductas. </s>
              <s id="N14908">item in epiſtola quo〈que〉 libri
                <lb/>
              de conoidibus & ſphęroidibus, quam Archimedes Deſitheo
                <lb/>
              ſcribit. </s>
              <s id="N1490E">cùm de obtuſiangulo conoideverba facit, conum vo­
                <lb/>
              catæquicrurem. </s>
              <s id="N14912">Quòd ſi Archimedes hos conos vocauit æ­
                <lb/>
              quicrures, cui dubium, ipſum eosad differentiam eorum, qui
                <lb/>
              non ſunt æquicrures ita nuncupaſſe? </s>
              <s id="N14918">qui verò non ſunt æ­
                <lb/>
              quicrures ex ipſomet Apollonio ſunt ſcaleni; nam æquicrures
                <lb/>
              hoc modo coni axes habent baſibus erectos. </s>
              <s id="N1491E">qui igitur non
                <lb/>
              erunt æquicrures, eorum axes ſuis baſibus nunquàm erunt e­
                <lb/>
              recti. </s>
              <s id="N14924">Præterea idem quo〈que〉 confirmari poteſt ex demon­
                <lb/>
              ſtratione vigeſimæquintæ propoſitionis eiu
                <gap/>
              dem libri, in qua
                <lb/>
              cùm nominet Archimehes conum rectum proculdubiò ad
                <lb/>
              differentiam eorum, qui non ſuntrecti ita eum nuncupauit.
                <lb/>
              nam ſi Aichimedes (ex illorum ſententia) conos tan ùm re­
                <lb/>
              ctos cognouiſſet; quorſum his in locis conum rectum, vel æ­
                <lb/>
              quicrurem nominaſſet? </s>
              <s id="N14934">ſat ſibi fuiſſet conum tantum dixiſſe.
                <lb/>
              Ne〈que〉 verò dicendum eſt Archimedem per cono recto intel
                <lb/>
              lexiſſe conum rectangulum eo modo, 〈que〉m ſupra expoſui­
                <lb/>
              mus. </s>
              <s id="N1493C">nam in ea propoſitione, dum conſtituit hunc conum,
                <lb/>
              non conſurgit conus rectangulus, ſed obtuſiangulus quapro
                <lb/>
              pter conum rectum nominatad differentiam coni ſcaleni. </s>
              <s id="N14942">Cę
                <lb/>
              terùm ut manifeſtè oſtendamus Archimedem conos </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum