Theodosius <Bithynius>; Clavius, Christoph, Theodosii Tripolitae Sphaericorum libri tres

List of thumbnails

< >
121
121 (109)
122
122 (110)
123
123 (111)
124
124 (112)
125
125 (113)
126
126 (114)
127
127 (115)
128
128 (116)
129
129 (117)
130
130 (118)
< >
page |< < (116) of 532 > >|
128116 ſegmento AGB; erit & AEB, tertia pars duorum rectorum. Deinde, quo-
niam latera DB, BA, trianguli DBA, lateribus FB, BA, trianguli FBA,
æqualia ſunt, angulosq́ue continent æquales;
erunt baſes AD, AF, inter ſe
1127. tertij. æquales.
Cum ergo AD, ipſi AE, æqualis ſit, propter æquales arcus AD,
2229.tertij. AE;
erit & AF, eidem AE, æqualis; ac propterea anguli AEF, AFE, æqua
335.primi. les inter ſe erunt:
Eſt autem AEF, vt oſtendimus, tertia pars duorum recto-
rum.
Igitur & AFE, tertia pars erit duorum rectorum; atque adeo & reliquus
EAF, tertia pars erit duorum rectorum.
Quare triangulum AEF, æquilate-
4432. primi. rum erit, ex coroll.
propof. 6. lib. 1. Eucl. ideoque recta EF, differentia chorda-
rum BD, BE, chordæ AE, vel AD, æqualis erit.
Differentia ergo chorda-
rum duorum arcuum ſemicirculi, &
c. quod erat demonſtrandum.
COROLLARIVM.
55Duæ chor-
dę duorum
arcuũ cõſi-
ciẽtiũ gra.
120. ſimul
ęquales sũt
chordęarcꝰ
cõpoſiti ex
arcu grad.
120. & arcu
minore il-
lorum duo
rum.
SEQVITVR hinc, ſi duorum arcuum, qui ſimul grad. 120. conficiant, chordæ ſimul
iungantur, effici chordam arcus compoſiti ex arcu grad.
120, & arcu minore illorum duo-
rum, ſi in æquales ſint.
Ita namque vides chordas BD, DA, arcuum BD, DA, conſicientium
grad.
120. ſimul ſumptas æquari chordæ BE, arcus BAE, compoſiti ex arcu BA, grad. 120.
& arcu AE, qui minori AD, æqualis eſt: propterea quòd vt demonſtratum eſt, differentia
EF, inter choidas BD, BE, æqualis eſt chordæ AD.
THEOR. 5. PROPOS. 7.
SI quantitas quantitatem excedat, ſemiſsis il-
66Si quãtitas
ſuꝑ & quã-
titaté ſemiſ
ſis ſemiſs ẽ
ſuperabit
exceſſus ſe
miſſe.
lius ſemiſsem huius ſuperabit exceſſus ſemiſſe.
SVPERET quantitas AB, quantitatẽ C, exceſſu DB, qui bifariã ſecetur in
125[Figure 125] E, &
ipſi EB, æqualis pona
tur AF.
Quoniã igitur AF,
EB, toti exceſſui DB, æ-
quales ſunt, erit reliqua
FE, ipſi C, æqualis.
Sece-
tur FE, bifaria in G.
Quia
ergo GE, GF, æquales
sũt;
additis æqualibus EB,
FA, æquales quoque erũt
GB, GA;
ac proinde & AB,
in G, ſecta erit bifariã.
Se-
miſsis igitur BG, ipſius
AB, ſuperat GE, ſemiſſem
ipſius FE, hoc eſt, ipſius C, exceſſu EB, qui ſem iſsis eſt exceſſus DB.
Si quan-
titas ergo quantitatem excedat, &
c. Quod demonſtrandum erat.
THEOR. 6. PROPOS. 8.
DIFFERENTIA ſinuum duorum

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index