Alberti, Leone Battista
,
Architecture
,
1755
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
Scan
Original
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
page
|<
<
of 320
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
003/01/131.jpg
"
pagenum
="
113
"/>
of Stones? </
s
>
<
s
>the greater it is, the more we blame
<
lb
/>
the Folly of the Expence, and condemn the
<
lb
/>
Builder's inconſiderate Luſt of heaping up Stone
<
lb
/>
upon Stone without Contrivance. </
s
>
<
s
>The having
<
lb
/>
ſatisfied Neceſſity is a very ſmall Matter, and
<
lb
/>
the having provided for Conveniency affords
<
lb
/>
no Manner of Pleaſure, where you are ſhocked
<
lb
/>
by the Deformity of the Work. </
s
>
<
s
>Add to this,
<
lb
/>
that the very Thing we ſpeak of is itſelf no
<
lb
/>
ſmall help to Conveniency and Duration: For
<
lb
/>
who will deny that it is much more convenient
<
lb
/>
to be lodged in a neat handſome Structure,
<
lb
/>
than in a naſty ill-contrived Hole? </
s
>
<
s
>or can any
<
lb
/>
Building be made ſo ſtrong by all the Contri
<
lb
/>
vance of Art, as to be ſafe from Violence and
<
lb
/>
Force? </
s
>
<
s
>But Beauty will have ſuch an Effect
<
lb
/>
even upon an enraged Enemy, that it will diſ
<
lb
/>
arm his Anger, and prevent him from offering
<
lb
/>
it any Injury: Inſomuch that I will be bold to
<
lb
/>
ſay, there can be no greater Security to any
<
lb
/>
Work againſt Violence and Injury, than Beau
<
lb
/>
ty and Dignity. </
s
>
<
s
>Your whole Care, Diligence
<
lb
/>
and Expence, therefore ſhould all tend to this,
<
lb
/>
that whatever you build may be not only uſe
<
lb
/>
ful and convenient, but alſo handſomely
<
lb
/>
adorned, and by that means delightful to the
<
lb
/>
Sight, that whoever views it may own the Ex
<
lb
/>
pence could never have been better beſtowed.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>But what Beauty and Ornament are in them
<
lb
/>
ſelves, and what Difference there is between
<
lb
/>
them, may perhaps be eaſier for the Reader to
<
lb
/>
conceive in his Mind, than for me to explain
<
lb
/>
by Words. </
s
>
<
s
>In order therefore to be as brief
<
lb
/>
as poſſible, I ſhall define Beauty to be a Har
<
lb
/>
mony of all the Parts, in whatſoever Subject it
<
lb
/>
appears, fitted together with ſuch Proportion
<
lb
/>
and Connection, that nothing could be added,
<
lb
/>
diminiſhed or altered, but for the Worſe. </
s
>
<
s
>A
<
lb
/>
Quality ſo Noble and Divine, that the whole
<
lb
/>
Force of Wit and Art has been ſpent to pro
<
lb
/>
cure it; and it is but very rarely granted to any
<
lb
/>
one, or even to Nature herſelf, to produce any
<
lb
/>
Thing every Way perfect and compleat. </
s
>
<
s
>How
<
lb
/>
extraordinary a Thing (ſays the Perſon intro
<
lb
/>
duced in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Tully
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) is a handſome Youth in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Athens!
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
This Critick in Beauty found that there was
<
lb
/>
ſomething deficient or ſuperfluous, in the Per
<
lb
/>
ſons he diſliked, which was not compatible
<
lb
/>
with the Perfection of Beauty, which I imagine
<
lb
/>
might have been obtained by Means of Orna
<
lb
/>
ment, by painting and concealing any Thing
<
lb
/>
that was deformed, and trimming and poliſhing
<
lb
/>
what was handſome; ſo that the unſightly
<
lb
/>
Parts might have given leſs Offence, and the
<
lb
/>
more lovely more Delight. </
s
>
<
s
>If this be grant
<
lb
/>
ed we may define Ornament to be a Kind of
<
lb
/>
an auxiliary Brightneſs and Improvement to
<
lb
/>
Beauty. </
s
>
<
s
>So that then Beauty is ſomewhat
<
lb
/>
lovely which is proper and innate, and diffuſed
<
lb
/>
over the whole Body, and Ornament ſome
<
lb
/>
what added or faſtened on, rather than proper
<
lb
/>
and innate. </
s
>
<
s
>To return therefore where we
<
lb
/>
leſt off. </
s
>
<
s
>Whoever would build ſo as to have
<
lb
/>
their Building commended, which every rea
<
lb
/>
ſonable Man would deſire, muſt build accord
<
lb
/>
ing to a Juſtneſs of Proportion, and this Juſt
<
lb
/>
neſs of Proportion muſt be owing to Art. </
s
>
<
s
>Who
<
lb
/>
therefore will affirm, that a handſome and juſt
<
lb
/>
Structure can be raiſed any otherwiſe than by
<
lb
/>
the Means of Art? </
s
>
<
s
>and conſequently this Part
<
lb
/>
of Building, which relates to Beauty and Orna
<
lb
/>
ment, being the Chief of all the Reſt, muſt
<
lb
/>
without doubt be directed by ſome ſure Rules
<
lb
/>
of Art and Proportion, which whoever ne
<
lb
/>
glects will make himſelf ridiculous. </
s
>
<
s
>But there
<
lb
/>
are ſome who will by no means allow of this,
<
lb
/>
and ſay that Men are guided by a Variety of
<
lb
/>
Opinions in their Judgment of Beauty and of
<
lb
/>
Buildings; and that the Forms of Structures
<
lb
/>
muſt vary according to every Man's particular
<
lb
/>
Taſte and Fancy, and not be tied down to any
<
lb
/>
Rules of Art. </
s
>
<
s
>A common Thing with the
<
lb
/>
Ignorant, to deſpiſe what they do not under
<
lb
/>
ſtand! It may not therefore be amiſs to confute
<
lb
/>
this Error; not that I think it neceſſary to
<
lb
/>
enter into a long Diſcuſſion about the Origin
<
lb
/>
of Arts, from what Principles they were de
<
lb
/>
duced, and by what Methods improved. </
s
>
<
s
>I
<
lb
/>
ſhall only take Notice that all Arts were begot
<
lb
/>
by Chance and Obſervation, and nurſed by
<
lb
/>
Uſe and Experience, and improved and per
<
lb
/>
fected by Reaſon and Study. </
s
>
<
s
>Thus we are
<
lb
/>
told that Phyſick was invented in a thouſand
<
lb
/>
Years by a thouſand thouſand Men; and ſo too
<
lb
/>
the Art of Navigation; as, indeed, all other
<
lb
/>
Arts have grown up by Degrees from the ſmall
<
lb
/>
eſt Beginnings.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>