Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
>
Scan
Original
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000862
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
98
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/138.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
debere fuiſſe ab eo falſam accelerati motus definitionem
<
lb
/>
institutam.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000863
">Quòd fueris autem cauſatus ipſum
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſuam
<
lb
/>
illam Definitionem experientia certa, ac euidenti non con
<
lb
/>
firmaſſe;
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
agnoſce quæſo tu-ne certiore, ac euiden
<
lb
/>
tiore
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
tuam
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
confirmâris.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Tuam,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
inquam; namlicet eam
<
lb
/>
ſemper eſſe repetas
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
vulgò receptam communemque;
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ec
<
lb
/>
qui
<
expan
abbr
="
nã
">nam</
expan
>
tamen illi ſunt, qui eodem
<
expan
abbr
="
tecũ
">tecum</
expan
>
modo definiunt?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000864
">Galileus certè eam non vt receptam, communemque
<
lb
/>
impugnauit, ſed vt eam, quæ poſſet fortè ab aliquo ex
<
lb
/>
cogitari. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000865
">Verumtamen id obiter. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000866
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Deinde, non minùs rectè aliter quoque vniformis accele
<
lb
/>
ratio haberi poteſt, vt ſtatim conſtabit: Satis-ne igitur Gali
<
lb
/>
lei definitio inde perfecta concluditur, quòd eà ſeruatâ vnifor
<
lb
/>
mis acceleratio habeatur?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000867
">Ita profectò, ſi per eam conſtet, quid ſit motum
<
lb
/>
accelerari, & accelerari æquabiliter; neque id vulgari,
<
lb
/>
ſiue potiùs tua, de qua dicis mox conſtiturum, perinde
<
lb
/>
præſtetur. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000868
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vt autem probes,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.028.01.138.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/138/1.jpg
"
number
="
27
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
quàm rectè iuxta Galilei
<
lb
/>
mentem, acceleratio illa
<
lb
/>
motus habeatur, iu
<
lb
/>
bes concipere duas li
<
lb
/>
neas
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
AB,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
AC,
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
angulum conſtituentes in
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
A,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
& tertiam
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
VX
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
per
<
lb
/>
anguli apicem
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
A
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
expan
abbr
="
ince-dentẽ
">ince
<
lb
/>
dentem</
expan
>
, & cùm prioribus
<
lb
/>
duabus angulos vtrim
<
lb
/>
que æqualeis conſtituentem: hanc, ſeruatâ ſemper eadem
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>