Guevara, Giovanni di, In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii, 1627

List of thumbnails

< >
141
141 		142
142
143
143 		144
144
145
145 		146
146
147
147 		148
148
149
149 		150
150
< >
page |< < of 303 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N10019">
            <p id="N14028" type="main">
              <s id="N1403A">
                <pb pagenum="134" xlink:href="005/01/142.jpg"/>
              ſubnectit; quoniam ſemper angulus circuli maioris, nutum
                <lb/>
              quendam habet ad angulum circuli minoris (in eo ſcilicet
                <lb/>
              contenti circa idem centrum.) Et ſicut diameter ad diame­
                <lb/>
              trum, ita maior circulus, ſeu potius circumferentia ad mino­
                <lb/>
              rem: In quolibet autem circulo maiori, infiniti circuli mi­
                <lb/>
              nores continentur. </s>
              <s id="N1404F">Quo igitur maiores fuerint ipſi circuli,
                <lb/>
                <expan abbr="maioremq.">maioremque</expan>
              proinde nutum, ſeu inclinationem ad minores
                <lb/>
              contentos habuerint, eo facilius, ac celerius mouebuntur. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N14059" type="main">
              <s id="N1405B">Sed vt clarius hic Philoſophi diſcurſus innoteſcat, obſer­
                <lb/>
              uandum eſt, per angulum circuli ſiue maioris, ſiue minoris,
                <lb/>
              non rectè intelligi ſectorem, vt cum Piccolomineo inter­
                <lb/>
              pretatur Baldus. </s>
              <s id="N14065">Nam ſector circuli maioris eundem an­
                <lb/>
              gulum conſtituit cum ſectore circuli minoris in eo conten­
                <lb/>
              ti; Ariſtoteles autem loquitur de angulo circuli maioris, ac
                <lb/>
              de angulo circuli minoris tanquam de diuerſis, dum ait
                <expan abbr="vnũ">vnum</expan>
                <lb/>
              habere nutum ad alterum; alioquin perperam comparaſſet
                <lb/>
              idem ad idem formaliter. </s>
              <s id="N14076">Quod ſi aliunde ſectores ipſi dif­
                <lb/>
              ferant inter ſe, vt reuera differunt in linearum longitudine,
                <lb/>
              ac ſpatio intercepto, ſecundum illam
                <expan abbr="rationẽ">rationem</expan>
              qua differunt,
                <lb/>
              & non ſecundum angulum, in quo conueniunt Ariſtoteles
                <lb/>
              loquutus fuiſſet ad probandam differentiam motus circuli
                <lb/>
              maioris reſpectu minoris. </s>
              <s id="N14087">Nec per angulum circuli inter­
                <lb/>
              pretari poſſumus
                <expan abbr="cũ">cum</expan>
              Blancano ipſius ſectoris arcum eo quod
                <lb/>
              opponatur angulo, qui eſt in centro circuli. </s>
              <s id="N14092">Siquidem fru­
                <lb/>
              ſtra ſignificaretur oppoſitum per
                <expan abbr="nomẽ">nomen</expan>
              eius, cui opponitur,
                <lb/>
              cum vtrum que habeat ſuum vocabulum. </s>
              <s id="N1409D">Et eadem ratione
                <lb/>
              per angulum trianguli, poſſet intelligi latus illi oppoſitum,
                <lb/>
              quod eſſet inuertere omnem proprietatem terminorum de
                <lb/>
              mente Ariſtotelis. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N140A7" type="main">
              <s id="N140A9">Potius ergo per angulum circuli, de quo hic loquitur Ari­
                <lb/>
              ſtoteles, intelligi videtur angulus, qui ex diametro, vel ſe­
                <lb/>
              midiametro, ac portione circumferentiæ efficitur, quem an­
                <lb/>
              gulum Euclides vocat etiam angulum ſemicirculi in 16.
                <lb/>
              prop. tertij. </s>
              <s id="N140B4">Etenim iuxta hanc acceptionem angulus cir­
                <lb/>
              culi maioris non eſt idem cum angulo circuli minoris, opti­
                <lb/>
              mèque intelligitur; & explicatur nutus, quem Philoſophus </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum