Gassendi, Pierre, De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur, 1646

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 360 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000959">
                <pb pagenum="113" xlink:href="028/01/153.jpg"/>
              ex A, verſus C, eodem momento, quo aliud ex D,
                <lb/>
              verſus E; notum eſt, ſi vtrumque quidem fer­
                <lb/>
                <figure id="id.028.01.153.1.jpg" xlink:href="028/01/153/1.jpg" number="31"/>
                <lb/>
              retur non accelerato, ſed æquabili motu,
                <lb/>
              euenturum eſſe, vt velocitate illius exſiſtente
                <lb/>
              dupla ad velocitatem iſtius, illud perueniret
                <lb/>
              in C, eodem momento, quo iſtud in E;
                <lb/>
              quoniam ſpatium ab illo ſuperatum foret
                <lb/>
              vbique ad ſpatium ab iſto ſuperatum, du­
                <lb/>
              plum; hoc eſt, forent ab illo ſuperatæ duæ
                <lb/>
              partes, cùm ab iſto vna: ab illo quatuor, cùm ab hoc
                <lb/>
              duæ, &c. </s>
              <s id="s.000960">quatenus ſpatia ſe haberent vbique, vt velo­
                <lb/>
              citates; hoc eſt, velocitas per totam AC, eſſet vbique
                <lb/>
              dupla velocitatis per totam DE. </s>
              <s id="s.000961">At verò, quoniam
                <lb/>
              heic agitur de motu non æquabili, ſed continenter
                <lb/>
              accelerato; ita diſcedant rursùs mobilia eodem tem­
                <lb/>
              pore, vnum ab A, aliud à D, vt ſuccreſcentibus conti­
                <lb/>
              nuò velocitatis gradibus, illud perueniendo in C, ac­
                <lb/>
              quiſierit duodecim, hoc perueniendo in E, ſex:
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Tum
                <lb/>
              interrogas,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Quid impediat, quò minùs illud perueniat
                <lb/>
              in C, eodem tempore, quo iſtud in E?
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ego verò reſ­
                <lb/>
              pondeo, nihil certè impedire, ſi tales eſſent, quales deſcribis
                <lb/>
              velocitate: taleis autem ſine dubio deſcribis, qualeis in prima
                <lb/>
              illa
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              G
                <emph type="italics"/>
              alilei propoſitione ſignificari putas. </s>
              <s id="s.000962">At hoc ſenſu hypo­
                <lb/>
              thetica illa Galilei propoſitio falſa eſt, euidenterque impoßi­
                <lb/>
              bilis: cùm nulla prorsùs ratione conſequens inferi poßit ex
                <lb/>
              antecedente. </s>
              <s id="s.000963">Hoc enim eſt Antecedens,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Acceleratio ve­
                <lb/>
              locitatis in deſcenſu grauium per totam AC, ita con­
                <lb/>
              tinua ſucceſſione creſcit, vt primùm in B acquiſitus
                <lb/>
              ſupponatur vnus aliquis velocitatis gradus; & vlteriùs
                <lb/>
              procedente motu, & continuò increſcente celeritate, </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>