Alberti, Leone Battista
,
Architecture
,
1755
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
Scan
Original
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
page
|<
<
of 320
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
003/01/171.jpg
"
pagenum
="
140
"/>
inaſmuch as they were to be one People joyn
<
lb
/>
ing in the Worſhip of one God, by whom
<
lb
/>
alone they were defended and preſerved. </
s
>
<
s
>Now
<
lb
/>
I cannot approve of either of theſe Particulars:
<
lb
/>
For as to the Firſt, it muſt be extremely in
<
lb
/>
convenient to the People, and eſpecially to
<
lb
/>
thoſe who frequent the Temples moſt, as the
<
lb
/>
old Folks and the Infirm; and the Second muſt
<
lb
/>
take very much from the Majeſty of the Struc
<
lb
/>
ture. </
s
>
<
s
>As to what I have obſerved in ſome
<
lb
/>
ſacred Edifices, built not long before our Time,
<
lb
/>
to which you aſcend by a few Steps on the
<
lb
/>
Outſide, and afterwards have as many to go
<
lb
/>
down again within, I will not abſolutely call it
<
lb
/>
ridiculous; but why they ſhould contrive it in
<
lb
/>
this Manner, I cannot imagine. </
s
>
<
s
>Indeed I would
<
lb
/>
have the Plain of the Portico, and ſo of the
<
lb
/>
whole Temple, ſomewhat raiſed above the Le
<
lb
/>
vel of the reſt of the Town, which gives the
<
lb
/>
Fabrick a great Air of Dignity. </
s
>
<
s
>But as in an
<
lb
/>
Animal, the Head, the Feet, and every parti
<
lb
/>
cular Member, ſhould be exactly proportioned
<
lb
/>
to all the other Members, and to all the reſt
<
lb
/>
of the Body; ſo in a Building, and eſpecially
<
lb
/>
in a Temple, all the Parts ſhould be made to
<
lb
/>
correſpond ſo exactly, that let us conſider which
<
lb
/>
of them we pleaſe, it may bear its juſt Propor
<
lb
/>
tion to all the Reſt. </
s
>
<
s
>Thus I find that moſt
<
lb
/>
of the beſt ancient Architects uſed to take their
<
lb
/>
Elevation of the Plain of their Temple, from
<
lb
/>
the Breadth of the Temple itſelf, which they
<
lb
/>
divided into ſix Parts, giving one of thoſe
<
lb
/>
Parts to the Height of the Plain or Mound of
<
lb
/>
the Structure. </
s
>
<
s
>Others, in larger Temples, raiſ
<
lb
/>
ed it only a ſeventh Part, and in the Biggeſt of
<
lb
/>
all, only a ninth. </
s
>
<
s
>The Portico, by its Nature,
<
lb
/>
ſhould have a continued Wall but of one Side,
<
lb
/>
and all the other Sides ſhould be full of large
<
lb
/>
Apertures for Paſſage. </
s
>
<
s
>Your Buſineſs there
<
lb
/>
fore is to conſider what Kind of Apertures you
<
lb
/>
would make uſe of; for Colonades are of two
<
lb
/>
Sorts; one where the Columns ſtand wide and
<
lb
/>
at a great Diſtance from each other; and the
<
lb
/>
other, where they ſtand cloſe and thick. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
neither of theſe Sorts is without its Inconveni
<
lb
/>
encies; for in the wide Sort, the Apertures are
<
lb
/>
ſo large, that if you would make uſe of an
<
lb
/>
Architrave, it is apt to break in the Middle,
<
lb
/>
and if you would carry Arches over it, it is no
<
lb
/>
eaſy Matter to turn them upon the Heads of
<
lb
/>
the Columns. </
s
>
<
s
>Where the Columns ſtand cloſe
<
lb
/>
and thick, they intercept the View, the Light
<
lb
/>
and the Paſſage, and upon this Account, a
<
lb
/>
third Manner has been found out, in a Medium
<
lb
/>
between the other two, which is called Elegant,
<
lb
/>
and avoids the Defects of the others; is more
<
lb
/>
convenient and much more approved. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
with theſe three Sorts we might have been con
<
lb
/>
tented; but the Diligence of Architects have
<
lb
/>
added two other Sorts, which I ſuppoſe may
<
lb
/>
be accounted for as follows: Not having a
<
lb
/>
ſufficient Number of Columns for the Exten
<
lb
/>
ſiveneſs of their Area, they deviated ſomewhat
<
lb
/>
from the laudable Medium, and imitated the
<
lb
/>
wider Apertures; and when they happen to
<
lb
/>
have Plenty of Columns, they were fond of
<
lb
/>
ſetting them cloſer together; whence aroſe five
<
lb
/>
Sorts of Intercolumniations, which we may call
<
lb
/>
by the Names of Wide, Cloſe, Elegant, Leſs
<
lb
/>
wide, Leſs-cloſe. </
s
>
<
s
>I further ſuppoſe it to have
<
lb
/>
happened, that the Architects being ſometimes
<
lb
/>
deſtitute of long Stones, were obliged to make
<
lb
/>
their Columns ſhorter, knowing that this
<
lb
/>
would take much from the Beauty of the
<
lb
/>
Structure, they ſet a Plinth under their Columns,
<
lb
/>
in order to give them their juſt Height; for
<
lb
/>
they found by a careful View and Examinati
<
lb
/>
on of other Buildings, that Columns had no
<
lb
/>
Grace in a Portico, unleſs a right Proportion
<
lb
/>
was obſerved both in their Height and Thick
<
lb
/>
neſs. </
s
>
<
s
>This induced them to lay down the fol
<
lb
/>
lowing Rules for this Purpoſe. </
s
>
<
s
>The Interco
<
lb
/>
lumniation may be unequal; but the Columns
<
lb
/>
themſelves muſt always be exactly equal. </
s
>
<
s
>Let
<
lb
/>
the Apertures that anſwers to the Door be ſome
<
lb
/>
what wider than the reſt. </
s
>
<
s
>Where the Inter
<
lb
/>
columniation is cloſe, make uſe of thinner Co
<
lb
/>
lumns; where it is wide, make uſe of thicker;
<
lb
/>
thus always proportioning the Thickneſs of the
<
lb
/>
Colums to the Interſpaces, and the Interſpaces
<
lb
/>
to the Thickneſs of the Columns, which you
<
lb
/>
may do by the following Rules. </
s
>
<
s
>In the cloſeſt
<
lb
/>
Sort of Colonades, let the Intercolumniation be
<
lb
/>
never narrower than one Diameter and a Half
<
lb
/>
of the Column; and in the wideſt, let it be
<
lb
/>
never broader than three Diameters and three
<
lb
/>
eighths. </
s
>
<
s
>In the elegant Sort of Colonades you
<
lb
/>
may allow two Diameters and a Quarter, in the
<
lb
/>
Leſs-cloſe, two; in the Leſs-wide, three. </
s
>
<
s
>The
<
lb
/>
middle Interſpace in the Colonade ſhould be
<
lb
/>
ſomewhat wider than the reſt, and the Ancients
<
lb
/>
direct us to give it an Addition of one fourth
<
lb
/>
Part: But by an Examination of old Buildings,
<
lb
/>
I find that this middle Interſpace was not al
<
lb
/>
ways made according to this Rule; for in the
<
lb
/>
wide Colonades, no good Architect ever made
<
lb
/>
it a fourth Part wider, but only about a
<
lb
/>
twelfth; and herein they acted very prudently,
<
lb
/>
leſt an unfaithful Architrave ſhould not be able
<
lb
/>
to bear even the Weight of its own Length, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>