Alberti, Leone Battista, Architecture, 1755

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 11]
[Figure 12]
[Figure 13]
[Figure 14]
[Figure 15]
[Figure 16]
[Figure 17]
[Figure 18]
[Figure 19]
[Figure 20]
[Figure 21]
[Figure 22]
[Figure 23]
[Figure 24]
[Figure 25]
[Figure 26]
[Figure 27]
[Figure 28]
[Figure 29]
[Figure 30]
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
< >
page |< < of 320 > >|
1hollowed into a Scotia which lay between the
two
Toruſſes.
A Scotia conſiſts of a hollow
Channel
edged on each Side with an Annulet;
to
each of thoſe Annulets they allowed one
ſeventh
Part of the Scotia, and the reſt they
hollowed
.
We have formerly laid it down as a
Rule
, that in all Building particular Care muſt
be
taken that all the Work be ſet upon a per­
fect
Solid.
Now it would not be ſo, if a Per­
pendicular
falling from the Edge of the upper
Stone
were to meet with any void Space or Hol­
low
.
For this Reaſon in cutting their Scotias,
they
took Care not to go in ſo far as to come
within
the Perpendicular of the Work above.
The Toruſſes muſt project one Half and an
Eighth
of their Thickneſs, and the extremeſt
Edge
of the Circle of the biggeſt Torus muſt
be
exactly Perpendicular to the Die.
This was
the
Method of the Dorians. The Ionians ap­
proved
of the Doric Height, but they made
two
Scotias, and placed two Fillets between

them
.
Thus their Baſe was the Height of
half
the Diameter of the Bottom of the Shaft;
and
this Height they divided into four Parts,
one
of which they aſſigned to the Height of the
Plinth
, giving eleven of thoſe fourth Parts to its
Breadth
: So that the whole Height of the Baſe
was
as four, and the Breadth as eleven.
Ha­
ving
thus deſigned their Plinth, they divided
the
reſt of the Height into ſeven Parts, two of
which
they gave to the Thickneſs of the lower
Torus
, and what remained beſides this Torus
and
the Plinth, they divided into three Parts,
one
of which they hollowed to the upper To­
rus
, and the two middle Parts they gave to the
two
Scotias with their two Fillets, which ſeem­
ed
to be ſqueezed between the two Toruſſes.
The Proportions of theſe Scotias and Fillets
were
as follows: They divided the Space be­
tween
the two Toruſſes into ſeven Parts, one
of
which they gave to each Fillet, dividing the
reſt
equally between the two Scotias.
As to
the
Projecture of the Toruſſes they obſerved
the
ſame Rules as the Dorians, and in hollow­
ing
their Scotias had regard to the Perpendi­
cular
Solid of the Stone that was to be laid
over
them; but they made their Annulets on­
ly
an eighth Part of the Scotia.
Others were
of
Opinion, that excluſive of the Plinth, the
Baſe
ought to be divided into ſixteen Parts,
which
we call Minutes; and of theſe they gave
four
to the lower Torus, and three to the upper,
three
and a half to the lower Scotia, and three
and
a half to the upper, and the other two
they
aſſigned to the Fillets between them.
Theſe were the Ionic Proportions. The Co­
rinthians
liked both the Ionic and the Doric
Baſe
too, and made uſe indifferently of them
both
; ſo that indeed they added nothing to the
Column
, but a Capital.
We are told that the
Etrurians under their Columns (which we call
the
Italian) uſed to put not a ſquare but a
round
Plinth; but I never met with ſuch a
Baſe
among the Works of the Ancients.
In­
deed
I have taken Notice, that in Porticoes
which
uſed to go clear round their circular
Temples
, the Ancients carved one continued
Plinth
quite round, which ſerved for all the
Columns
, and of the due Height which the
Plinth
of the Baſe ought to be of.
This I
doubt
not they did, becauſe they were con­
vinced
that ſquare Members did not ſuit with
a
circular Structure.
I have obſerved, that
ſome
have made even the Sides of the Abacus
of
their Capitals point to the Center of the
Temple
, which, if it were to be done in the
Baſes
, might not be altogether amiſs, though it
would
ſcarce be much commended.
And here
it
may not be improper to ſay ſomething of the
ſeveral
Members of the Ornaments made uſe
of
in Architecture; and they are theſe; the
Plat-band
, the Corona, the Ovolo, or Quarter­
round
, the ſmall Ovolo, or Ogee, the Cima­
inverſa
, and the Cymatium, or Doucine, both
upright
and reverſed.
All theſe particular
Members
have each a Projecture, but with
different
Lines.
The Plat-band projects in a
Square
like the Letter L, and is indeed the
ſame
as a Liſt or Fillet, but ſomewhat broader.
The Corona has a much greater Projecture
than
the Plat-band; the Ovolo, or Quarter­
round
, I was almoſt tempted to call the Ivy,
becauſe
it runs along and cleaves to another
Member
, and its Projecture is like a C placed
under
the Letter L, thus <30> and the ſmall Ovolo,
or
Ogee is only ſomewhat leſs.
But if you
place
this Letter C reverſed under the Letter L,
thus
<31> it forms the Cima-inverſa.
Again, if
under
the ſame Letter L you place an S in this
Manner
<32> it is called the Cymatium, or Gola
from
its Reſemblance to a Man's Throat; but
if
you place it inverted thus <33> it is called Cima­
inverſa
, or by ſome from the Similitude of its
Curve
, the Onda, or Undula.
Again, theſe
Members
are either plain, or elſe have ſome
other
Ornaments inſerted into them.
In the
Plat-band
or Faſcia it is common to carve
Cockle-ſhells
, Birds, or Inſcriptions.
In the
Corona
we frequently have Dentils, which are
made
in the following Proportions: Their

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index