Alberti, Leone Battista
,
Architecture
,
1755
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
Scan
Original
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
page
|<
<
of 320
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
caption
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
003/01/176.jpg
"
pagenum
="
143
"/>
hollowed into a Scotia which lay between the
<
lb
/>
two Toruſſes. </
s
>
<
s
>A Scotia conſiſts of a hollow
<
lb
/>
Channel edged on each Side with an Annulet;
<
lb
/>
to each of thoſe Annulets they allowed one
<
lb
/>
ſeventh Part of the Scotia, and the reſt they
<
lb
/>
hollowed. </
s
>
<
s
>We have formerly laid it down as a
<
lb
/>
Rule, that in all Building particular Care muſt
<
lb
/>
be taken that all the Work be ſet upon a per
<
lb
/>
fect Solid. </
s
>
<
s
>Now it would not be ſo, if a Per
<
lb
/>
pendicular falling from the Edge of the upper
<
lb
/>
Stone were to meet with any void Space or Hol
<
lb
/>
low. </
s
>
<
s
>For this Reaſon in cutting their Scotias,
<
lb
/>
they took Care not to go in ſo far as to come
<
lb
/>
within the Perpendicular of the Work above.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>The Toruſſes muſt project one Half and an
<
lb
/>
Eighth of their Thickneſs, and the extremeſt
<
lb
/>
Edge of the Circle of the biggeſt Torus muſt
<
lb
/>
be exactly Perpendicular to the Die. </
s
>
<
s
>This was
<
lb
/>
the Method of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Dorians.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
> The
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ionians
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ap
<
lb
/>
proved of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Doric
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Height, but they made
<
lb
/>
two Scotias, and placed two Fillets between
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg21
"/>
<
lb
/>
them. </
s
>
<
s
>Thus their Baſe was the Height of
<
lb
/>
half the Diameter of the Bottom of the Shaft;
<
lb
/>
and this Height they divided into four Parts,
<
lb
/>
one of which they aſſigned to the Height of the
<
lb
/>
Plinth, giving eleven of thoſe fourth Parts to its
<
lb
/>
Breadth: So that the whole Height of the Baſe
<
lb
/>
was as four, and the Breadth as eleven. </
s
>
<
s
>Ha
<
lb
/>
ving thus deſigned their Plinth, they divided
<
lb
/>
the reſt of the Height into ſeven Parts, two of
<
lb
/>
which they gave to the Thickneſs of the lower
<
lb
/>
Torus, and what remained beſides this Torus
<
lb
/>
and the Plinth, they divided into three Parts,
<
lb
/>
one of which they hollowed to the upper To
<
lb
/>
rus, and the two middle Parts they gave to the
<
lb
/>
two Scotias with their two Fillets, which ſeem
<
lb
/>
ed to be ſqueezed between the two Toruſſes.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>The Proportions of theſe Scotias and Fillets
<
lb
/>
were as follows: They divided the Space be
<
lb
/>
tween the two Toruſſes into ſeven Parts, one
<
lb
/>
of which they gave to each Fillet, dividing the
<
lb
/>
reſt equally between the two Scotias. </
s
>
<
s
>As to
<
lb
/>
the Projecture of the Toruſſes they obſerved
<
lb
/>
the ſame Rules as the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Dorians,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and in hollow
<
lb
/>
ing their Scotias had regard to the Perpendi
<
lb
/>
cular Solid of the Stone that was to be laid
<
lb
/>
over them; but they made their Annulets on
<
lb
/>
ly an eighth Part of the Scotia. </
s
>
<
s
>Others were
<
lb
/>
of Opinion, that excluſive of the Plinth, the
<
lb
/>
Baſe ought to be divided into ſixteen Parts,
<
lb
/>
which we call Minutes; and of theſe they gave
<
lb
/>
four to the lower Torus, and three to the upper,
<
lb
/>
three and a half to the lower Scotia, and three
<
lb
/>
and a half to the upper, and the other two
<
lb
/>
they aſſigned to the Fillets between them.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Theſe were the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ionic
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Proportions. </
s
>
<
s
>The
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Co
<
lb
/>
rinthians
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
liked both the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ionic
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Doric
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Baſe too, and made uſe indifferently of them
<
lb
/>
both; ſo that indeed they added nothing to the
<
lb
/>
Column, but a Capital. </
s
>
<
s
>We are told that the
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Etrurians
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
under their Columns (which we call
<
lb
/>
the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Italian
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
) uſed to put not a ſquare but a
<
lb
/>
round Plinth; but I never met with ſuch a
<
lb
/>
Baſe among the Works of the Ancients. </
s
>
<
s
>In
<
lb
/>
deed I have taken Notice, that in Porticoes
<
lb
/>
which uſed to go clear round their circular
<
lb
/>
Temples, the Ancients carved one continued
<
lb
/>
Plinth quite round, which ſerved for all the
<
lb
/>
Columns, and of the due Height which the
<
lb
/>
Plinth of the Baſe ought to be of. </
s
>
<
s
>This I
<
lb
/>
doubt not they did, becauſe they were con
<
lb
/>
vinced that ſquare Members did not ſuit with
<
lb
/>
a circular Structure. </
s
>
<
s
>I have obſerved, that
<
lb
/>
ſome have made even the Sides of the Abacus
<
lb
/>
of their Capitals point to the Center of the
<
lb
/>
Temple, which, if it were to be done in the
<
lb
/>
Baſes, might not be altogether amiſs, though it
<
lb
/>
would ſcarce be much commended. </
s
>
<
s
>And here
<
lb
/>
it may not be improper to ſay ſomething of the
<
lb
/>
ſeveral Members of the Ornaments made uſe
<
lb
/>
of in Architecture; and they are theſe; the
<
lb
/>
Plat-band, the Corona, the Ovolo, or Quarter
<
lb
/>
round, the ſmall Ovolo, or Ogee, the Cima
<
lb
/>
inverſa, and the Cymatium, or Doucine, both
<
lb
/>
upright and reverſed. </
s
>
<
s
>All theſe particular
<
lb
/>
Members have each a Projecture, but with
<
lb
/>
different Lines. </
s
>
<
s
>The Plat-band projects in a
<
lb
/>
Square like the Letter L, and is indeed the
<
lb
/>
ſame as a Liſt or Fillet, but ſomewhat broader.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>The Corona has a much greater Projecture
<
lb
/>
than the Plat-band; the Ovolo, or Quarter
<
lb
/>
round, I was almoſt tempted to call the Ivy,
<
lb
/>
becauſe it runs along and cleaves to another
<
lb
/>
Member, and its Projecture is like a C placed
<
lb
/>
under the Letter L, thus <30> and the ſmall Ovolo,
<
lb
/>
or Ogee is only ſomewhat leſs. </
s
>
<
s
>But if you
<
lb
/>
place this Letter C reverſed under the Letter L,
<
lb
/>
thus <31> it forms the Cima-inverſa. </
s
>
<
s
>Again, if
<
lb
/>
under the ſame Letter L you place an S in this
<
lb
/>
Manner <32> it is called the Cymatium, or Gola
<
lb
/>
from its Reſemblance to a Man's Throat; but
<
lb
/>
if you place it inverted thus <33> it is called Cima
<
lb
/>
inverſa, or by ſome from the Similitude of its
<
lb
/>
Curve, the Onda, or Undula. </
s
>
<
s
>Again, theſe
<
lb
/>
Members are either plain, or elſe have ſome
<
lb
/>
other Ornaments inſerted into them. </
s
>
<
s
>In the
<
lb
/>
Plat-band or Faſcia it is common to carve
<
lb
/>
Cockle-ſhells, Birds, or Inſcriptions. </
s
>
<
s
>In the
<
lb
/>
Corona we frequently have Dentils, which are
<
lb
/>
made in the following Proportions: Their
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>