Guevara, Giovanni di
,
In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii
,
1627
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 303
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
id
="
N10019
">
<
p
id
="
N14FFA
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N1500C
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
169
"
xlink:href
="
005/01/177.jpg
"/>
cundum verò eſt, quia in ipſo ſciſſionis actu, facta aliqua di
<
lb
/>
ſtractione partium molis adhuc non in totum diſciſſæ, ver
<
lb
/>
tex cunei, quo pondera vtrinque diuelli, ac moueri debe
<
lb
/>
rent, nihil vt plurimum tangit in rimula dum ipſa vlterius
<
lb
/>
dilatatur. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N1501C
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N1501E
">Ad primum tamen reſpondetur, ſi concipiamus in cuneo
<
lb
/>
vectes explicatos ex parte A vrgere verſus G, & ex parte
<
lb
/>
C vrgere verſus D; verticem verò non tranſgredi punctum
<
lb
/>
B; ſed in eo quieſcere: tunc quidem ſequi, extrema ipſorum
<
lb
/>
vectium ſibi inuicem obſtare in puncto B, nè in contrarium
<
lb
/>
moueantur, moueantque adiacentia pondera modo deſcri
<
lb
/>
pto. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N1502D
">At ſi concipiamus, vt re vera eſt apicem ipſum ſimul
<
lb
/>
pergere ad partes EF: tunc in ipſo motu optimè intellige
<
lb
/>
mus, concurrentiam extremorum vtriuſque vectis in vni
<
lb
/>
cum illud punctum terminatiuum verticis, nihil obſtare
<
lb
/>
quominus pars vectis, quæ ſequitur poſt illud vbi K, impel
<
lb
/>
lat aliam ſibi correſpondentem in mole ſcindenda verſus
<
lb
/>
N: & pars vbi H, aliam ſimilem verſus M. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N1503C
">Siquidem hoc
<
lb
/>
ipſo, quod vertex vlterius pergit, partes illum vtrinque con
<
lb
/>
ſequentes in proportionatum ſibi locum ſuccedere non poſ
<
lb
/>
ſent, niſi prius inde
<
expan
abbr
="
expellerẽtur
">expellerentur</
expan
>
per ſciſſionem partes molis,
<
lb
/>
quæ eundem locum occupabant. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N1504B
">Pars autem vbi K in
<
lb
/>
mole ſcindenda non expellitur inde virtute vectis AB; ſicut
<
lb
/>
nec H virtute vectis CB; cum nullam vim vtraque pati
<
lb
/>
poſſit à vecte niſi illa nitatur in contrariam partem. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N15054
">Ergo ex
<
lb
/>
pulſio partis K fit virtute vectis CB, quæ contra nititur; &
<
lb
/>
expulſio partis H, virtute vectis AB. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N1505C
">Quod eſt ipſum ver
<
lb
/>
ticem, ſeu apicem fungi officio extremorum vtriuſque ve
<
lb
/>
ctis ad remouendas vtrinque partes corporis ſcindendi tan
<
lb
/>
quam ad leuanda pondera virtute impetus in contrarium
<
lb
/>
impreſsi in alterutro extremo, vt in AC vbi applicatur po
<
lb
/>
tentia mouentis, ſeu percutientis. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N15069
">Non igitur res ita eſt con
<
lb
/>
cipienda quaſi vertex B tanquam extremum duorum ve
<
lb
/>
ctium contra nitentium ſimul moueretur ad oppoſita ad
<
lb
/>
partes M, & N: Sed vt dum ipſe vertex B mouetur ſu
<
lb
/>
per lineam BO, partes cunei vtrinque ſequentes, ac paula-</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>