Fabri, Honoré, Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur, 1665

List of thumbnails

< >
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
< >
page |< < of 248 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000184">
                <pb pagenum="14" xlink:href="025/01/018.jpg"/>
              cris diſtantia, ſuppoſito tali velocitatis gradu acquiſito, ſive à Motore
                <lb/>
              extrinſeco, ſive per motum acceleratum prævium. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000185">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Hæc ſanè in rem iſtam optimè quadrarent, ſi Mars Perigæus
                <lb/>
              ſemper eſſet oppoſitus, & Apogæus ſemper coniunctus, quod tamen cum
                <lb/>
              veritate
                <expan abbr="">non</expan>
              conſentit; Nam ſæpè extra oppoſitionem eſt Perigæus & Apo­
                <lb/>
              gæus extra coniunctionem; quod certè in hac tua hypotheſi abſurdiſſimum
                <lb/>
              eſſet; ſupponamus enim Martis Apogæum in O, Perigæum in E, & con­
                <lb/>
              iunctionem citiùs fieri, quàm Mars perveniat ad Apogæum ; haud dubiè
                <lb/>
              coniunctio non fiet in O, ſed versùs ortum, id eſt, versùs R. </s>
              <s id="s.000186">Igitur poſt
                <lb/>
              alteram revolutionem punctum coniunctionis promovebitur vltra, versùs
                <lb/>
              ortum, atque ita deinceps; igitur poſt multas revolutiones, eveniet tan­
                <lb/>
              dem, vt coniunctio fiat in Perigæo, & Mars in Solem fortè impingat. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000187">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000188"> Nodus iſte nullo negotio ſolvitur; ſi enim Sol ſemper eſſet in
                <lb/>
              mediocri diſtantia, haud dubiè coniunctio ſemper fieret in Apogæo, &
                <lb/>
              oppoſitio in Perigæo ; ſi autem Sol ſemper eſſet in Perigæo, oppoſitio fie­
                <lb/>
              ret vltra Perigæum, citrà verò ſi Sol ſemper eſſet in Apogæo ; nempe Sol
                <lb/>
              circa ſuum Apogæum verſans, maiores orbes decurrit, igitur tardiùs
                <lb/>
              abſolvit; Quid mirum igitur, ſi Mars citiùs illum aſſequatur? </s>
              <s id="s.000189">cùm ta­
                <lb/>
              men Sol Perigæus paulò minores circulos deſcribat, citiùs igitur illos ab­
                <lb/>
              ſoluit, Mais igitur tardiùs illum aſſequitur: At cùm Sol ſemper recurrat
                <lb/>
              ab Apogæo ad Perigæum per mediocrem diſtantiam, & viciſſim, iuſta fit
                <lb/>
              compenſatio breviorum & maiorum orbium, & pro diverſa coniuga­
                <lb/>
              tione vtriuſque Apogæi & Perigæi, eſt enim diverſa vtrinque revolutio­
                <lb/>
              num periodus modò præit Coniunctio Apogæum, modò ſubſequitur,
                <lb/>
              v. g. ſi Sol circa Apogæum verſetur cum tardiùs orbes ſuos, vtpote ma­
                <lb/>
              iores decurrat, citiùs illum Mars aſſequitur; ac proinde coniunctio præit
                <lb/>
              Apogæum ; ſi verò circa Perigæum, citiùs ſuos orbes conficit, ac pro­
                <lb/>
              inde tardiùs illum Mars aſſequitur, ac proinde ſequitur poſt Apogæum
                <lb/>
              coniunctio. </s>
              <s id="s.000190">Hæc niſi facilia ſint & ex ſimpliciſſimis principiis deducta,
                <lb/>
              quid ſimplex ſit & facile, nequit intelligi. </s>
              <s id="s.000191">Suppono hoc loco Solem in
                <lb/>
              Apogæo poſitum, maiorem orbem deſcribere, ſcilicet diurnum, mi­
                <lb/>
              nimum verò in Perigæo, licèt ſecus aliquando accidat, de quo infra;
                <lb/>
              Sed ad rem hanc ſufficit, Solem aliquando maiores, aliquando mino­
                <lb/>
              res, aliàs mediocres orbes per annum decurrere; exempli autem gra­
                <lb/>
              tia, ſuppono, maiores eſſe in Apogæo, minores in Perigæo, medio­
                <lb/>
              cres in mediocri diſtantia. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000192">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000193"> Negari non poteſt, quin hæc ſint facillima; at vnum ſcire
                <lb/>
              averem, cur Mars aliquando matutinus bis emergat, & ſemel occul­
                <lb/>
              tetur. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000194">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000195"> Vnus Keplerus, ſaltem quod ſciam, hoc aſſerit, cui tamen
                <lb/>
              parum fidei habendum eſſe puto; Vt vt ſit, hoc etiam facilè explicari
                <lb/>
              poteſt; nam ſi Coniunctio præcedat Apogæum, cùm Mars ſuos orbes
                <lb/>
              citiùs abſoluat, quàm Sol ſuos, Solem poſt ſerelinquit versùs ortum, at­
                <lb/>
              que adeò emergit; quia verò paulò poſt proximè accedit ad Apogæum, &
                <lb/>
              Sol ad Perigæum, Mars tardiùs, Sol citiùs ſuum orbem decurrit, hinc </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>