Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/184.jpg
"
pagenum
="
176
"/>
and I will give you an anſwer. </
s
>
<
s
>Tell me therefore, how much do
<
lb
/>
you think ſufficeth to make that motion ſwifter than this?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMP. </
s
>
<
s
>I will ſay for example, that if that motion by the
<
lb
/>
gent were a million of times ſwifter than this by the ſecant, the
<
lb
/>
pen, yea, and the ſtone alſo would come to be extruded.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>You ſay ſo, and ſay that which is falſe, onely for
<
lb
/>
want, not of Logick, Phyſicks, or Metaphyſicks, but of
<
lb
/>
try; for if you did but underſtand its firſt elements, you would
<
lb
/>
know, that from the centre of a circle a right line may be drawn
<
lb
/>
to meet the tangent, which interſecteth it in ſuch a manner, that
<
lb
/>
the part of the tangent between the contact and the ſecant, may
<
lb
/>
be one, two, or three millions of times greater than that part of
<
lb
/>
the ſecant which lieth between the tangent and the circumference,
<
lb
/>
and that the neerer and neerer the ſecant ſhall be to the contact,
<
lb
/>
this proportion ſhall grow greater and greater
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in infinitum
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; ſo
<
lb
/>
that it need not be feared, though the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
vertigo
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
be ſwift, and the
<
lb
/>
motion downwards ſlow, that the pen or other lighter matter can
<
lb
/>
begin to riſe upwards, for that the inclination downwards always
<
lb
/>
exceedeth the velocity of the projection.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I do not perfectly apprehend this buſineſſe.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I will give you a moſt univerſal yet very eaſie demon</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg367
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſtration thereof. </
s
>
<
s
>Let a proportion be given between B A [
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in Fig.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
3.] and C: And let B A be greater than C at pleaſure. </
s
>
<
s
>And let
<
lb
/>
there be deſcribed a circle, whoſe centre is D. </
s
>
<
s
>From which it is
<
lb
/>
required to draw a ſecant, in ſuch manner, that the tangent may
<
lb
/>
be in proportion to the ſaid ſecant, as B A to C. </
s
>
<
s
>Let A I be
<
lb
/>
ſuppoſed a third proportional to B A and C. </
s
>
<
s
>And as B I is to
<
lb
/>
I A, ſo let the diameter F E be to E G; and from the point G,
<
lb
/>
let there be drawn the tangent G H. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſay that all this is done as
<
lb
/>
was required; and as B A is to C, ſo is H G to G E. </
s
>
<
s
>And in
<
lb
/>
gard that as B I is to I A, ſo is F E to E G; therefore by
<
lb
/>
ſition, as B A is to A I; ſo ſhall F G be to G E. </
s
>
<
s
>And becauſe C
<
lb
/>
is the middle proportion between
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
A and A I; and G H is a
<
lb
/>
middle term between F G and G E; therefore, as B A is to C,
<
lb
/>
ſo ſhall F G be to G H; that is H G to G E, which was to be
<
lb
/>
demonſtrated.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg367
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A geometrical
<
lb
/>
demonſtration to
<
lb
/>
prove the
<
lb
/>
bility of extruſion
<
lb
/>
by means of the
<
lb
/>
terreſtrial
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
vertigo.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I apprehend this demonſtration; yet nevertheleſſe, I
<
lb
/>
am not left wholly without hæſitation; for I find certain
<
lb
/>
ſed ſcruples role to and again in my mind, which like thick and
<
lb
/>
dark clouds, permit me not to diſcern the cleerneſſe and neceſſity
<
lb
/>
of the concluſion with that perſpicuity, which is uſual in
<
lb
/>
matical Demonſtrations. </
s
>
<
s
>And that which I ſtick at is this. </
s
>
<
s
>It is
<
lb
/>
true that the ſpaces between the tangent and the circumference do
<
lb
/>
gradually diminiſh
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in infinitum
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
towards the contact; but it is alſo
<
lb
/>
true on the contrary, that the propenſion of the moveable to </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>