Monantheuil, Henri de, Aristotelis Mechanica, 1599

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 252 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <pb xlink:href="035/01/185.jpg" pagenum="145"/>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002227">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Ergo magna ſecuris feriens ſecabit: impoſita vero minimè.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002228">Motione grauitatis.]
                  <foreign lang="el">ki/nhsis tou= ba/rous</foreign>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                eſt motus cuique
                  <lb/>
                graui occultus inhærens.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
            <subchap1>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002229">
                  <foreign lang="el">e)/ti de\ kai\ gi/netai sfh\n o( pe/lekus: o( de\ sfh\n
                    <lb/>
                  mikro\s w)\n, mega/la dii/+sthsi, dia\ to\ ei)=nai e)k du/o moxlw=n
                    <lb/>
                  e)nanti/ws sugkeime/nwn.</foreign>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002230">Præterea ſecuris fit cu­
                  <lb/>
                neus. </s>
                <s id="id.002231">Cuneus
                  <expan abbr="autẽ">autem</expan>
                paruus
                  <lb/>
                  <expan abbr="exiſtẽs">exiſtens</expan>
                magna diuidit. </s>
                <s id="id.002232">quia
                  <lb/>
                ex duobus vectibus conſti­
                  <lb/>
                tutus eſt contrario modo
                  <lb/>
                collocatis. </s>
              </p>
              <p type="head">
                <s id="id.002233">COMMENTARIVS. </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002234">Præterea ſecuris.]
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Altera eſt problematis propoſiti ſolutio
                  <lb/>
                ſumpta è cunei forma, quæ in ſecuri propter aciem acutam, & ſu­
                  <lb/>
                perioris partis latitudinem conſpicua eſt. </s>
                <s id="id.002235">Comprehendetur hoc ſyl­
                  <lb/>
                logiſmo.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002236">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Cuneus paruus cum ſit, magna diuidit. ( ex anteced. )
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002237">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Securis feriens eſt cuneus.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002238">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Ergo ſecuris feriens magna diuidet.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002239">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Sed hic obijci poteſt, quod ſecuris impoſita etiam eſt cuneus. </s>
                <s id="id.002240">Et ita
                  <lb/>
                eſt, ſed non actu. </s>
                <s id="id.002241">Quia opus eſt malleo percutiente, tanquam motore
                  <lb/>
                vectium. </s>
                <s id="id.002242">Securis autem feriens eſt cuneus annexus malleo, & ideo
                  <lb/>
                actu cuneus.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002243">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Cardanus propoſitum problema aliter ſoluit, cauſamque putat.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="id.002244">quia aër non poteſt in ictu effugere. </s>
                <s id="id.002245">quanquam enim acuta cuſpide ſit
                  <lb/>
                ſecuris, momento tamen tam paruo temporis effugere nequit. </s>
                <s id="id.002246">Ne igi­
                  <lb/>
                tur nimis denſetur, cogitur in poros ingredi ſubiecti ligni, at que cu­
                  <lb/>
                nei vice diuidere illud. </s>
                <s id="id.002247">Indicio eſt, inquit, quod paulo tardior ictus
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <lb/>
                  <arrow.to.target n="marg34"/>
                  <lb/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                maximum in diuidendo diſcrimen adfert dilabente aëre. </s>
                <s id="id.002248">Solutionem
                  <lb/>
                hanc reprehendit Scaliger, conſentitque cum Ariſtotele motum mo­
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <lb/>
                  <arrow.to.target n="marg35"/>
                  <lb/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                uere, & ſecurim, ſi comprimatur manu, ſecare propter nixum: multo
                  <lb/>
                magis ſi ictu adigatur, & ex Ioanne Iucundo proponit aliud proble­
                  <lb/>
                ma dignum quæſitu. </s>
                <s id="id.002249">Quot pondo proportionem habeat pugnus ho­
                  <lb/>
                minis ferientis, cum ſeipſo non feriente comparatus.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>