Fabri, Honoré
,
Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur
,
1665
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Table of figures
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 83
[out of range]
>
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 83
[out of range]
>
page
|<
<
of 248
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002164
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
183
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/187.jpg
"/>
torum vel pedum circiter 32. vt vir erat Totricellus profundi ratiocinij,
<
lb
/>
illico prædixit, fore vt Mercurius attolli non poſſet ſupra altitudinem
<
lb
/>
pedum 2 3/4 vel 1/3 circiter; quod cùm in fiſtula vitrea probaſſet; provt præ
<
lb
/>
dixerat, ſucceſſit eventus; in hunc porrò modum probavit; Sit vas ABG,
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.025.01.187.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/187/1.jpg
"
number
="
68
"/>
<
lb
/>
in quo ſit Mercurius EBF, ſit fiſtula vitrea BCD probè clauſa in D,
<
lb
/>
apertain B, repleatur Mercurio, tum admoto preſſè digito in B, immerga
<
lb
/>
tur extremitas B intra Mercurium, ſtatutaque fiſtula in perpendiculari ſitu
<
lb
/>
ſubducatur digitus ex B, deſcendit Mercurius, nullo aëre ſubeunte, ita
<
lb
/>
tamen, vt ſegmentam extantis Mercurij CI; ſive longior ſit fiſtula, ſive
<
lb
/>
brevior, ſit ſemper pedum 2. 1/4 circiter, ſive tubus anguſtior ſit, ſive
<
lb
/>
laxior. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002165
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Chryſocom.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002166
"> Huius experimenti primum inventorem & auctorem P. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002167
">Va
<
lb
/>
lerianum Magnum fuiſſe, accepi, immo hic, ni fallor, libellum de hoc ar
<
lb
/>
gumento in lucem edidit, in quo hoc idem atteſtatur, quantum ſcilicet
<
lb
/>
meminiſſe poſſum. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002168
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Auguſtin.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002169
"> Nihil profectò magis à veritate alienum; Torricellus haud
<
lb
/>
dubiè, & citra omnem controverſiam, primus inventor fuit; immo alij
<
lb
/>
multi hoc idem argumentum ante Valerianum tractarunt; cujus ratio, &
<
lb
/>
cauſa phyſica vtinam æquè facilè & certo ſtatui à nobis poſſet, atque in
<
lb
/>
ventor; nempe res mihi difficillima eſſe videtur, ſtatuere, quid occupet ſe
<
lb
/>
gmentum illud fiſtulæ CD, quod vacuum eſſe videtur; & qua vi alterum
<
lb
/>
IC ſupra ſuperficiem EF, ſuſtineatur; in his duobus enucleandis, tua
<
lb
/>
deſudabit, opinor, induſtria, Antime; vtinam, de quo valde dubito,
<
lb
/>
fœliciter. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002170
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Antim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002171
"> Tentabo ſaltem, idque vnum operæ pretium erit, quod nec in
<
lb
/>
mea, nec in alia cujuſpiam hypotheſi, difficultatem, ſi quæ fortè inſit, diſ
<
lb
/>
ſimulaturus ſim. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002172
">Ab illa autem initium duco, quæ & Torricelli & mul
<
lb
/>
torum hodie num eſt, in qua ſcilicet, præfatum experimentum in hunc </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>