Fabri, Honoré
,
Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur
,
1665
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 248
>
Scan
Original
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 248
>
page
|<
<
of 248
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002172
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
184
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/188.jpg
"/>
modum explicatur: Cylindrus aëris gravitans ſuſtinet, inquiunt, Mer
<
lb
/>
curium IC, ejuſdem ſcilicet cum illo ponderis; eſtque perfectum inter
<
lb
/>
vtrumque æquilibrium; ſegmentum verò fiſtulæ CD omni corpore va
<
lb
/>
cuum remanet, hæc porrò hypotheſis ex duplici præſertim capite effi
<
lb
/>
caciter, vt aiunt ab aſſertore probatur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002173
">Primò, ex eo quod quæcumque tan
<
lb
/>
dem ſit fiſtulæ altitudo & latitudo, ſegmentum extans (ſic appello IC)
<
lb
/>
æqualis ſemper ſit altitudinis IC. 2. ſcilicet pedum, & 1/3 vel 1/4. Secundò,
<
lb
/>
ex eo quod aquæ ſegmentum extans 32. ſcilicet pedum circiter
<
expan
abbr
="
ejuſdẽ
">ejuſdem</
expan
>
ſit
<
lb
/>
cum ſegmento Mercurij extante ponderis; eſt enim fere gravitas Mercurij
<
lb
/>
ad gravitatem aquæ vt 14. ad 1. vis ergo æqualis ſuſtinet ſegmentum ex
<
lb
/>
tans Mercurij 2. pedum 1/3, & ſegmentum extans aquæ 32. pedum; ſed illa
<
lb
/>
vis alia eſſe nequit à cylindro aëris gravitante. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002174
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Auguſtin.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002175
"> Accedit non leve adminiculum, ex eo quod à vitis accura
<
lb
/>
tiſſimis probatum fuit, in vertice altiſſimum montium ſegmentum ex
<
lb
/>
tans Mercurij eſſe minus IC ; quia ſcilicet cylindrus aëris gravitantis ac
<
lb
/>
ſuſtinentis prædictum ſegmentum extans, brevior eſt; igitur minor illius
<
lb
/>
vis & niſus. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002176
">Qaod autem ſegmentum CD omnino vacuum ſit, vel ex eo
<
lb
/>
conſtat, quod inclinata fiſtula in BK, aſſurgit Mercurius & totum ſe
<
lb
/>
gmentum CD occupat, non tamen videtur, quò abeat, aut ſe recipiat cor
<
lb
/>
pus illud, quod vacuitatem CD occupabat, ſi fortè aliquod eſſet; ex quo,
<
lb
/>
ni fallor; nova confirmatio prioris partis ducitur; cum illa vis, quæ ſuſti
<
lb
/>
net ſegmentum Mercurij IC in perpendiculo; ſufficiat ad ſuſtinendum
<
lb
/>
ſegmentum BK in plano inclinato, quod ex doctrina motuum facilè de
<
lb
/>
monſtrarem, ſi res ita poſtularet. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002177
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Antim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002178
"> Non deſunt etiam alia adminicula, de quibus infra; accedunt
<
lb
/>
tamen graviſſimæ difficultates; omitto leviores, ne in nugis vos deti
<
lb
/>
neam, & vt ab ea parte, quæ ad vacuum ſpectat, initium ducam, multa
<
lb
/>
reverà, opponuntur, quæ dubito, an ſolvi poſſint. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002179
">Primò, Quiſquis adſtruit
<
lb
/>
huiuſmodi vacuum in ſegmento fiſtulæ CD, de omni corpore quamvis
<
lb
/>
alioquin tenuiſſimo, negat, quod ſpatium illud occupet; at ſi dixero, ibi
<
lb
/>
eſſe vel tenuem materiam Cartheſij, vel æthera, vel ſubtiliſſimum humo
<
lb
/>
rem dilatatum, non dico certò, ſed probabiliter tantùm, quo quæſo ar
<
lb
/>
gumento prædictum vacuum probare poterit? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002180
">Secundò, Si vacuum eſt,
<
lb
/>
quomodo lumine perfunditur? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002181
">Si enim lumen conſiſtit in effluvio quo
<
lb
/>
dam igneo; vel in motione cujuſdam materiæ ſubtiliſſimæ, vt docent De
<
lb
/>
mocritici; cum vacuitatem illam ſubeat, occupet, impleat, ibi certè va
<
lb
/>
cuum non eſt; aut certè lumen eſt meta qualitas per medium diffuſa, vt
<
lb
/>
docent ij, qui meliùs cenſent; atque ita cùm qualitas ſine ſubjecto eſſe
<
lb
/>
non poſſit,
<
expan
abbr
="
eoqūe
">eoque</
expan
>
corporeo, ſegmentum CD vacuum non eſt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002182
">Tertiò, Si
<
lb
/>
vacuum eſſet, totus quantus aër & æther, qui terreſtri globo vicinior eſt,
<
lb
/>
in dictum ſegmentum gravitaret ad ſtatuen dum æquilibrium. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002183
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Chryſoc.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002184
"> Suſtine, quæſo; dici enim poteſt, æthera non eſſe gravem;
<
lb
/>
aut certè ſi gravis ſit; incredibilem eſſe proportionem gravitatis aëris ad
<
lb
/>
gravitatem ætheris, vtrum que deſtruit vim huius argumenti. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002185
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Auguſtin.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002186
"> Immo ſunt, qui dicunt, atmoſphæram tantùm gravitare, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>