Guevara, Giovanni di
,
In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii
,
1627
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 303
>
Scan
Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 303
>
page
|<
<
of 303
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
id
="
N10019
">
<
p
id
="
N1077B
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N1078B
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
12
"
xlink:href
="
005/01/020.jpg
"/>
transferat. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N107A2
">Ratio vero eſt manifeſta, nam huiuſmodi
<
expan
abbr
="
obiectũ
">obiectum</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
totale & adæquatum in qualibet ſcientia coaleſcere debet
<
expan
abbr
="
tũ
">tum</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
ex ſubiecto materiali etiam adæquato, ac formalitate ſub qua
<
lb
/>
de illo agitur; tum etiam ex omnibus ijs quæ de ipſo demon
<
lb
/>
ſtrantur in ſcientia. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N107B5
">Explicatum ergo ſubiectum materiale
<
lb
/>
ſub illa formalitate cum omnibus quæ de illo demonſtrantur
<
lb
/>
per theoremata ac problemata mechanica, conſtituetur to
<
lb
/>
tale & adæquatum huius facultatis obiectum, in ordine ad
<
lb
/>
quod tota eius eſſentia, ac ratio ſpecifica deſumenda eſt, ac
<
lb
/>
paulatim inferius explicanda. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N107C2
"
type
="
head
">
<
s
id
="
N107C4
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Qua ratione facultas Mechanica conſtituatur
<
lb
/>
Ars & Scientia.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N107CD
"
type
="
head
">
<
s
id
="
N107CF
">ADDITIO TERTIA.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N107D3
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N107D5
">Hviuſque ad ſignificandum habitum intellectualem
<
expan
abbr
="
cõ-templationis
">con
<
lb
/>
templationis</
expan
>
mechanicæ, vt plurimum vſi ſumus no
<
lb
/>
mine facultatis mechanicæ, eo quod nomen facultas abſtra
<
lb
/>
hat à propria ſignificatione artis, aut ſcientiæ,
<
expan
abbr
="
latiusq.
">latiusque</
expan
>
pateat
<
lb
/>
ſecundum communem omnium conceptionem. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N107E4
">Quare de
<
lb
/>
terminandum nunc eſt, vtrum talis habitus vel facultas, ſit ve
<
lb
/>
rè in ſe, ac propriè vocari poſſit tum ars, tum ſcientia. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N107EB
">Quod
<
lb
/>
ſanè auſpicari debet à communi ratione artis atque ſcientiæ
<
lb
/>
ab Ariſtotele ſæpius explicata,
<
expan
abbr
="
aptèq.
">aptèque</
expan
>
paſſim licet non ſem
<
lb
/>
per diſtincta. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N107F8
">Nam 6 Ethicorum cap. 4. artem docet eſſe
<
lb
/>
habitum quendam vera cum ratione
<
expan
abbr
="
effectiuũ
">effectiuum</
expan
>
circa id quod
<
lb
/>
aliter eſſe atque aliter poteſt; & cuius principium ſit in eo
<
lb
/>
quod efficitur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N10805
">Vnde eorum quæ ex neceſſitate ſunt, vel fiunt
<
lb
/>
ſecundum naturam, nullam ait eſſe artem, cum hæc in ſe prin
<
lb
/>
cipium habeant. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N1080C
">Ac proinde ſequenti capite diſtinguit artem
<
lb
/>
à ſcientia, eo quod ſcientia ſit de rebus quæ non poſſunt ali
<
lb
/>
ter ſe habere. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N10813
">Nihilominus 1. Metaphiſices cap. 1. idem
<
lb
/>
Philoſophus artem videtur confundere cum ſcientia ſaltem
<
lb
/>
practica; ait enim, artem eſſe de vniuerſalibus, ac propter
<
lb
/>
cauſam ea quæ ſfiunt cognoſcere, exemplum adhibens tum </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>