Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
>
Scan
Original
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001265
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
161
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/201.jpg
"/>
loco, hoc eſt, in articulum xii, attigeras obiter ſolùm.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001266
">Quippe tuis verbis recitatis, & deducta occaſione, ob
<
lb
/>
quam illa texueras, demonſtratum eſt tuam fuiſſe,
<
lb
/>
quam iam inficiaris, expreſſam ſententiam; heincque
<
lb
/>
adeò probatum manet me non modò probabili, ſed
<
lb
/>
conuincenti etiam ratione (niſi te velis Paralogiſtam,
<
lb
/>
quod abſit vt cenſeam, ridiculoſiſſimum haberi) ac
<
lb
/>
non meo iure, ſed ex tuis verbis hanc ſuppoſitionem,
<
lb
/>
quaſi tuam ſupponere, G
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
raue deſcendens per spatium
<
lb
/>
AB in parteis quotlibet æqualeis diuiſum, percurrere partem
<
lb
/>
ſecundam DE
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(quæ illeic fuit BC)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in dimidio eius tem
<
lb
/>
poris, quo percurritur prior pars AD
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(quæ illeic AB) &
<
lb
/>
quod idem eſt,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
partem DE percurri veiocitate dupla eius,
<
lb
/>
velocitatis, qua tranſcurritur AD.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001267
"> Sequitur. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001268
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
At Primum, quid amabò, caußæ est, cur cùm antè nume
<
lb
/>
ro tuæ Reſponſionis X. volueris velocitatem per totam AE
<
lb
/>
duplam eſſe velocitatis per primam partem AD, idque ex
<
lb
/>
meis quoque principiis neceſſarium eſſe aſſerueris: nunc, mutato
<
lb
/>
conſilio, velocitatem per ſolam partem DE velocitatis per
<
lb
/>
partem AD acquiſitæ duplam eſſe contendas: & quidem, vt
<
lb
/>
ais, ex principiis item meis?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001269
">Quid cauſſæ ſit, quæris? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001270
">Non ſanè mutatio conſilij
<
lb
/>
in me; ſed quæ falſorum principiorum, incommodo
<
lb
/>
rumque ex iis deductorum variatio in te obſeruatur.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001271
">Nam quòd velis quidem velocitatem acquiſitam in E
<
lb
/>
eſſe duplam velocitatis acquiſitæ in D, vt ſpatium AE,
<
lb
/>
ſpatij AD duplum eſt: contendo iam velocitatem, qua
<
lb
/>
percurritur DE, eſſe duplam eius, qua tranſcurritur AD,
<
lb
/>
ſeu, quæ acquiritur per AD: &, quòd tu contendas ab
<
lb
/>
A, vſque ad E, augeri æquabiliter, idcircò ſum argu-</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>