Gassendi, Pierre, De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur, 1646

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 360 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001324">
                <pb pagenum="169" xlink:href="028/01/209.jpg"/>
              Subiunxi autem,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              atque ego quidem huc-vſque nullum video
                <lb/>
              paralogiſmum:
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ac tum ſum conatus ex errore ſuppo­
                <lb/>
              ſito deducere abſurditatem. </s>
              <s id="s.001325">Quæſo igitur, an meo
                <lb/>
              iure, & ſine vlla, niſi demonſtratione, ſaltem veriſimili­
                <lb/>
              tudine dixerim hunc errorem ex tuis principiis deduci?
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001326">Et cùm fuerim conteſtatus in mea ſeu demonſtratio­
                <lb/>
              ne, ſeu veriſimili ratione nullum ſubeſſe paralogiſ­
                <lb/>
              mum; cur tu, ſi quempiam eſſe putaſti, verè ſubeſſe
                <lb/>
              non oſtendiſti? </s>
              <s id="s.001327">Nam quòd fueris ratiocinatus ex con­
                <lb/>
              cluſione illa
                <expan abbr="quã">quam</expan>
              ſtatutum à te principium dixiſti, ve­
                <lb/>
              locitatem per ſecundam partem non eſſe duplam ve­
                <lb/>
              locitatis per primam, id non arguit illud non ſequi ex
                <lb/>
              alio tuo principio, ex quo aliunde etiam potuerit per
                <lb/>
              media quæpiam alia mendoſa illa concluſio trahi: ac
                <lb/>
              potiſſimùm, cum ſit adeò verum, quod dicitur vulgò,
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              ex poſito vno abſurdo conſequi poſſe innumera.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001328"> Quam­
                <lb/>
              obrem neque vllus exinde concludi poteſt paralogiſ­
                <lb/>
              mus; neque non conſtat quàm variè tua ratiocinatio
                <lb/>
              peccet, quámque mea illa confiimetur ex confecto
                <lb/>
              dilemmate, quod repetere nihil eſt neceſſe. </s>
              <s id="s.001329">Quæſo
                <lb/>
              etiam, potueriſ-ne paulò antè exaggerere
                <emph type="italics"/>
              debuiſſe me
                <lb/>
              primùm demonſtrare ea, quæ à te tanquam falſa reiecta vi­
                <lb/>
              de bam, ex conſtitutis à te principiis nihilominus ſequi, ante­
                <lb/>
              quam eadem, vt tua decreta impeterem,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              &c. </s>
              <s id="s.001330">Scilicet res
                <lb/>
              præſtita fuerat, & ita quidem, vt te inuitaſſem, ad de­
                <lb/>
              tegendum paralogiſmum, ſi quem ſubeſſe exiſtimares.
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001331">Miſſum autem facio, vt non modo hoc præterm ſeris,
                <lb/>
              ſed diſſimulâris etiam incommodum ex hac poſitione
                <lb/>
              deductum de Progreſſione illa ſpatiorum pluſquam
                <lb/>
              tripla eodem articulo ſupputata; niſi quod ad calcem </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>