Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
321 - 330
331 - 340
341 - 350
351 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001343
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
172
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/212.jpg
"/>
neque mea ſententia eſt,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
acquiſitum in E gradum ſecun
<
lb
/>
dum exprimi lineâ EH,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſed huius lineæ dimidio ſo
<
lb
/>
lum: ſiquidem tota linea EH non ſecundum modò
<
lb
/>
gradum exprimit, acquiſitum abvſque D, verùm etiam
<
lb
/>
primum acquiſitam ab vſque A, ipſumque iunctum
<
lb
/>
cum ſecundo. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001344
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Concludeſ ne igitur velocitatem tempore
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
DE
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
acquiſi
<
lb
/>
tam duplam eſſe velocitatis acquiſitæ toto tempore AD?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001345
">Non; ſed acquiſitam toto tempore AE: ita vt tem
<
lb
/>
pore AD acquiratur vnus velocitatis gradus, & illo
<
lb
/>
perſeuerante, æquiualentéque duobus, quantum ad
<
lb
/>
ſpatia ſuperanda tempore æquali attinet, acquiratur
<
lb
/>
interim alius ſuccedente tempore DE, qui cum eo
<
lb
/>
iunctus fiat aggregatum, quod ſit ipſius duplum, vt
<
lb
/>
deductum ſuperiùs eſt. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001346
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hoc certè, ſi conceſſeris, cùm tempora
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
AD,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
DE
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ponantur æqualia, neceſſe omnino fuerit, vt etiam spatia
<
lb
/>
æqualibus illis temporibus emenſa inter ſe ſint, vt velocita
<
lb
/>
tes: acproinde vt spatium ſecundo tempore
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
DE
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
decurſum ſpa
<
lb
/>
tii tempore
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
AD
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
tranſmißi præcisè ſit duplum: non autem (vt
<
lb
/>
ſtatuit
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
G
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
alileus) triplum.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001347
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Si conceſſero?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
inquis, atqui vides vt iam negârim, nec
<
lb
/>
me negaturum ignoraſſe potes: cùm ab initio vſque
<
lb
/>
controuerſiæ, & à primis illis Reſponſionis articulis
<
lb
/>
non alia ratione exhibuerim opinionem intelligen
<
lb
/>
dam; adeò proinde, vt ſi ipſe proſequi velles vlterius,
<
lb
/>
argumentando ad hominem, contentus eſſe non de
<
lb
/>
bueris ſola hac interrogatione, & conceſſionem ſup
<
lb
/>
ponere, quam iure à me non obtineres: ſed ſuppoſita
<
lb
/>
negatione, vrgere in me aliquid, quod appoſitum ad </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>