Alberti, Leone Battista
,
Architecture
,
1755
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
>
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
>
page
|<
<
of 320
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
003/01/213.jpg
"
pagenum
="
161
"/>
into the Repreſentation of God, ought to be
<
lb
/>
the nobleſt Material that can be had. </
s
>
<
s
>Next to
<
lb
/>
the nobleſt is the rareſt; and yet I would not be
<
lb
/>
for making them of Salt, as
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Solinus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
informs us
<
lb
/>
the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Sicilians
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
uſed to do; nor of Glaſs, like
<
lb
/>
ſome mentioned by
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pliny;
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
neither would I
<
lb
/>
have them of maſſy Gold or Silver, not that
<
lb
/>
I diſlike thoſe Materials for being produced of
<
lb
/>
a barren Soil, or for their ſickly Hue; but for
<
lb
/>
other Reaſons: Among which one is, that I
<
lb
/>
think it ſhould be a Point of Religion with us
<
lb
/>
that thoſe Repreſentations which we ſet up to
<
lb
/>
be adored as Gods, ſhould bear as much Re
<
lb
/>
ſemblance to the Divine Nature as poſſible.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>For this Reaſon, I would have them made im
<
lb
/>
mortal in Duration, as far as it is in the Power
<
lb
/>
of mortal Men to effect it. </
s
>
<
s
>And here I cannot
<
lb
/>
help enquiring, what ſhould be the Reaſon of
<
lb
/>
a very whimſical, though very old Perſuaſion,
<
lb
/>
which is firmly rooted in the Minds of the Vul
<
lb
/>
gar, that a Picture of God, or of ſome Saint in
<
lb
/>
one Place ſhall hear the Prayers of Votaries,
<
lb
/>
when in another Place the Statue of the very
<
lb
/>
ſame God or Saint ſhall be utterly deaf to them?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Nay, and what is ſtill more nonſenſical, if you
<
lb
/>
do but remove the very ſame Statue, for which
<
lb
/>
the People uſed to have the higheſt Venerati
<
lb
/>
on, to ſome other Station, they ſeem to look
<
lb
/>
upon it as a Bankrupt, and will neither truſt it
<
lb
/>
with their Prayers, nor take the leaſt Notice of
<
lb
/>
it. </
s
>
<
s
>Such Statues ſhould therefore have Seats
<
lb
/>
that are fixed, eminent and peculiar to them
<
lb
/>
ſelves. </
s
>
<
s
>It is ſaid, that there never was any
<
lb
/>
beautiful Piece of Workmanſhip known in the
<
lb
/>
Memory of Man to be made of Gold, as if that
<
lb
/>
Prince of Metals diſdained to owe any thing to
<
lb
/>
the Skill of an Artificer. </
s
>
<
s
>If this be true, we
<
lb
/>
ſhould never uſe it in the Statues of our Gods,
<
lb
/>
which we ſhould deſire to make ſuitable to the
<
lb
/>
Subject. </
s
>
<
s
>Beſides that, the Thirſt of the Gold
<
lb
/>
might tempt ſome not only to rob our Statue
<
lb
/>
of his Beard, but to melt him quite down. </
s
>
<
s
>I
<
lb
/>
ſhould chuſe Braſs, if the lovely Purity of fine
<
lb
/>
white Marble did not oblige me to give that
<
lb
/>
the Preference. </
s
>
<
s
>Yet there is one Conſiderati
<
lb
/>
on which weighs very much in Favour of Braſs,
<
lb
/>
and that is its Duration, provided we make our
<
lb
/>
Statue not ſo maſſy, but that the Odium and
<
lb
/>
Deteſtation of ſpoiling it may be much greater
<
lb
/>
than the Profit to be made by melting it down
<
lb
/>
for other Purpoſes: I would have it indeed no
<
lb
/>
more than if it were beat out with a Hammer,
<
lb
/>
or run into a thin Plate, ſo as to ſeem no more
<
lb
/>
than a Skin. </
s
>
<
s
>We read of a Statue made of
<
lb
/>
Ivory, ſo large that it would hardly ſtand under
<
lb
/>
the Roof of the Temple. </
s
>
<
s
>But that I diſlike,
<
lb
/>
for there ought to be a due Proportion obſerv
<
lb
/>
ed as well in Size, as in Form and Compoſiti
<
lb
/>
on: Upon which Accounts too the Figures of
<
lb
/>
the greater Deities, with their gruff Beards, and
<
lb
/>
ſtern Countenances, do not ſuit well in the
<
lb
/>
ſame Place with the ſoft Features of Virgins. </
s
>
<
s
>I
<
lb
/>
am likewiſe of Opinion, that the having but
<
lb
/>
few Statues of Gods, may help to increaſe the
<
lb
/>
People's Veneration and Reverence to them.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Two, or at moſt three, may be placed proper
<
lb
/>
ly enough upon the Altar. </
s
>
<
s
>All the reſt may be
<
lb
/>
diſpoſed in Niches in other convenient Places.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>In all ſuch Repreſentations of Gods and Heroes,
<
lb
/>
the Sculptor ſhould endeavour as much as poſ
<
lb
/>
ſible, to expreſs both by the Habit and Action
<
lb
/>
of the Figure, the Character and Life of the
<
lb
/>
Perſon. </
s
>
<
s
>Not that I approve of thoſe extrava
<
lb
/>
gant Attitudes which make a Statue look like
<
lb
/>
the Hero of a Droll, or a Prize-fighter; but I
<
lb
/>
would have ſomewhat of a Dignity and Maje
<
lb
/>
ſty both in the Countenance, and all the reſt
<
lb
/>
of the Body, that ſhould ſpeak the God, ſo that
<
lb
/>
he may ſeem both by his Look and Poſture to
<
lb
/>
be ready to hear and receive his Adorers. </
s
>
<
s
>Such
<
lb
/>
ſhould be the Statues in Temples. </
s
>
<
s
>Let others
<
lb
/>
be left to Theatres, and other profane Edifices.
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.003.01.213.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
003/01/213/1.jpg
"
number
="
59
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>