Fabri, Honoré
,
Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur
,
1665
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 248
>
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 248
>
page
|<
<
of 248
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002496
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
201
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/215.jpg
"/>
terit propterea ſuſtinere ſegmentum Mercurij centuplum ſegmenti CI;
<
lb
/>
quia ſupponamus ſuſtineri; cùm hic Mercurius gravitet, & hæc vis gra
<
lb
/>
vitationis ſuperet reſiſtentiam prædictæ materiæ educendæ & dilatandæ,
<
lb
/>
non eſt dubium, quin prævalere debeat, atque adeò Mercurius deſcendere;
<
lb
/>
illa materia educi & tendi, donec ad punctum C perveniat, in quo æqua
<
lb
/>
lis eſt vis gravitationis Mercurij CI prædictæ reſiſtentiæ; licèt autem ſu
<
lb
/>
perficies Mercurij EF tantulum attollatur, non tamen propterea totus Cy
<
lb
/>
lindrus, cujus baſis incumbit in ſuperficiem EF attollendus eſt, ſed tantu
<
lb
/>
lum comprimitur aër per appulſum & exceptionem illius, qui Mercurio
<
lb
/>
in vas ABG illapſo in locum cedit; ſic prorſus per appulſum fumi, va
<
lb
/>
poris cujuſlibet halitus, immò alicujus aëris rareſcentis tractus, reliquus aër
<
lb
/>
comprimitur; nempe dictu, immò & cogitatu ridiculum eſt, totum aëris
<
lb
/>
Cylindrum inde attolli; ex hac ſolutione manifeſtum argumentum ducitur,
<
lb
/>
contra primam illam hypotheſim, quam ſupra refutavi. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002497
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Auguſt.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Sæpè miratus ſum, hæc ab iis non videri, qui conſtantiſſimè
<
lb
/>
aſſerunt, præfatum vtriuſque Cylindri, aëris ſcilicet, & Mercurij æquili
<
lb
/>
brium, ducta à duobus aliis Cylindris, aquæ ſcilicet & Mercurij analogia;
<
lb
/>
licèt enim in his præfatum æquilibrium locum habeat, ſecus tamen in il
<
lb
/>
lis, & manifeſtum diſcrimen eſt, quia Mercurius deſcendere nequit, niſi
<
lb
/>
vel aquæ Cylindrus attollatur, vel aqua, aut ipſe Mercurius, vi ponderis
<
lb
/>
ſeu preſſionis comprimatur; ſed aqua comprimi nequit, nedum Mercu
<
lb
/>
rius; vt jam ſuprà dictum eſt; ſervatur igitur æquilibrium; at verò aër
<
lb
/>
facilè comprimi poteſt, vt patet; vnde Mercurij Cylindrus ID facilè deſ
<
lb
/>
cendit; nempe aër tantulùm comprimitur; nec ideò infra C non deſcen
<
lb
/>
dit, quod ſit æquilibrium inter Cylindrum aeris, & Cylindrum Mercu
<
lb
/>
rij IC, ſed quia deſcendere nequit, niſi ſuperet reſiſtentiam materiæ di
<
lb
/>
latabilis, eamque geminam, vt ſupra rectè diſtinguere mihi viſus es; ſed
<
lb
/>
ad alias objectiones venio; dicunt enim oppoſitæ ſententiæ aſſertores, ſe
<
lb
/>
gmentum Mercurij extantis IC in ima Valle eſſe longius, in vertice mon
<
lb
/>
tis brevius; ita probatum fuiſſe ferunt, in montibus Alverniæ, & Majo
<
lb
/>
ris Britanniæ; hoc autem, quia in ima Valle Cylindrus aëris altior eſt;
<
lb
/>
igitur majus illius pondus; igitur longius Mercurij ſegmentum ſuſtinet;
<
lb
/>
ſecus in vertice montium. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002498
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Antim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002499
"> Si laudatus ſupra Autor, qui hæc refert, teſtis oculatus fuiſſet,
<
lb
/>
non detrectarem fidem Autori ac curatiſſimo; ſed quia hæc à ſe tan
<
lb
/>
tum auribus accepiſſe vltro fatetur, plenam fidem adhibendam eſſe non
<
lb
/>
crediderim, præſertim cum aliquando contigerit, vt hoc experimentum
<
lb
/>
in altiſſimis regionibus probatum, ſecus quàm illi ferunt, ſucceſſerit; præ
<
lb
/>
terquam quod cuipiam homini, qui primus hoc probaſſe dicitur in mon
<
lb
/>
tibus Alverniæ, nullam fidem habendam eſſe duco; cujus enim fidei homo
<
lb
/>
ſit, omnes catholici probè norunt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002500
">Sed demus, ita eſſe, non tamen inde
<
lb
/>
concluditur, præfatum Cylindrorum æquilibrium, cùm alia cauſa & ra
<
lb
/>
tio eſſe poſſit; nempe in altiſſimis montibus, præſertim ſi in acumina
<
lb
/>
tum verticem attollantur, non verò ſi in vaſtas planities explicentur,
<
lb
/>
vel ſenſim aſſurgant, leniore ac molliore clivo, in altiſſimis; inquam, mon-</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>