Jordanus de Nemore, [Liber de ratione ponderis], 1565

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
< >
page |< < of 32 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.25.02.03">
                  <pb xlink:href="049/01/025.jpg"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
            <subchap1>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.26.00.01">Quaestio uigesimaquinta.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.26.01.01">Si uero sub regula centrum designetur, uix continget in hoc
                  <lb/>
                situ stabiliri pondera.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.26.02.01">
                  <figure id="id.049.01.025.1.jpg" xlink:href="049/01/025/1.jpg" number="35"/>
                Sit Responsa ut prius a, b, c, et
                  <lb/>
                perpendiculum d, b, e, sitque e, cen
                  <lb/>
                trum sub Responsa, et pondera a,
                  <lb/>
                et c, ductis igitur lineis e, a, e, c, qua
                  <lb/>
                si inde ipsis, sint, sic sita sunt ponde­
                  <lb/>
                ra. </s>
                <s id="id.2.26.02.02">ipsius igitur in hoc situ aeque pon­
                  <lb/>
                derantibus si fiat qualitercunque nu­
                  <lb/>
                tus in alterutra partium ueluti in a,
                  <lb/>
                crescet ex parte a, portio. Responsae
                  <lb/>
                usque ad rectitudinem quae signetur
                  <lb/>
                h, l, 3, ut sit communis sectio ipsius, et
                  <lb/>
                regulae in l,</s>
                <s id="id.2.26.02.03"> sicque grauius reddetur con
                  <lb/>
                tinue donec circumuoluatur regu­
                  <lb/>
                la sub e. </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
            <subchap1>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.27.00.01">Quaestio uigesimasexta.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p>
                <figure id="id.049.01.025.2.jpg" xlink:href="049/01/025/2.jpg" number="36"/>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
            <subchap1>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.27.01.01">Possibile est igitur Respon­
                  <lb/>
                sa aeque distantis collocata quan
                  <lb/>
                tumlibet pondus in alterutra
                  <lb/>
                parte suspendere, quae regulam
                  <lb/>
                ab aequalitate non separet.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p>
                <s id="id.2.27.02.01">Sic regula a, b, c, centrum b, linea
                  <lb/>
                directionis d, b, e, sitque Responsa
                  <lb/>
                suo pondere in aequalitate sita.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="id.2.27.02.02">Sumatur igitur alia Responsa aequa
                  <lb/>
                lis grossiciei, et ponderis, quae sit h, t,
                  <lb/>
                3, posito t, in eius medio, sitque portio
                  <lb/>
                regulae h, b, in utralibet parte minor
                  <lb/>
                longitudine quam sit h, t, et pendeat regula h, t, 3, ab h, fixa ut t, sit in dire
                  <lb/>
                cto sub b, secta a linea directionis in t, dico ergo ipsa ita dependens non fa­
                  <lb/>
                ciet mutare literam, sita est enim quasi si traheretur linea b, 3, et in ipsa
                  <lb/>
                linea b, h, dependeret omnesque partes eius aequaliter a, t, distantes aeque
                  <lb/>
                ponderarent, distant enim aequaliter a linea directionis, quia t, 3, ponde­
                  <lb/>
                rant, quantum b, t, t, h, non ergo fiet nutus, sed et super hoc si quolibet pon
                  <lb/>
                dus suspendatur a, t, non faciet, hinc uel inde nutum.</s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>