Monantheuil, Henri de, Aristotelis Mechanica, 1599

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 252 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.002704">
                  <pb xlink:href="035/01/220.jpg" pagenum="180"/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                idem numerus vbique eſſe: ſi quidem magnum quid ſit & demon­
                  <lb/>
                ſtratu dignum, minus lororum in vna extenſione expendi: quam in
                  <lb/>
                altera: qui
                  <expan abbr="deniq;">denique</expan>
                in vtraque figura obliquas
                  <expan abbr="habẽt">habent</expan>
                lineas, quanquam
                  <lb/>
                alias alijs obliquiores: & tamen duæ antehac rationes videntur in
                  <lb/>
                vna figura poſtulare obliquas, in altera rectas. </s>
                <s id="id.002705">Nos igitur aliter Car­
                  <lb/>
                dani veſtigia obſcura, & ni fallor imperfecta, vt ſunt
                  <expan abbr="pleraq;">pleraque</expan>
                huius
                  <lb/>
                hominis ferè omnia vt arbitror,
                  <expan abbr="quanquã">quanquam</expan>
                ſemper ingeniosè ſcriben­
                  <lb/>
                tis, ſecuti, apertius & perfectius totum hoc
                  <expan abbr="negotiũ">negotium</expan>
                euoluemus. </s>
                <s id="id.002706">At­
                  <lb/>
                que in primis dicimus extendi lora ſecundum diametrum, non eſſe
                  <lb/>
                ab angulo ad angulum oppoſitum: ſed ſecundum rectas, quæ à latere
                  <lb/>
                ad latus oppoſitum extenduntur, vt ſint aliæ ſecundum longitudi­
                  <lb/>
                nem, aliæ ſecundum latitudinem. </s>
                <s id="id.002707">Sic enim diameter non
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <foreign lang="el">diagw/nios</foreign>
                  <lb/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                ſumi videtur: quaſi dimetiens, vt quæ dimetiatur longitudinem vel
                  <lb/>
                latitudinem, æqualis videlicet facta, quo modo licet hîc ab Ariſto­
                  <lb/>
                tele reiecto, hodie adhuc vtuntur. </s>
                <s id="id.002708">Atque hoc modo ſi non intelliga­
                  <lb/>
                tur diameter: ſed
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <foreign lang="el">diagw/nios,</foreign>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                tam obliquæ erunt in vna forma li­
                  <lb/>
                neæ: quam in altera: ſicque quæ de ruptione vel fißione & opportu­
                  <lb/>
                nitate dicta ſunt, hîc non conuenient, quod eſſet abſurdum. </s>
                <s id="id.002709">His igi­
                  <lb/>
                tur ita poſitis deſcribantur duæ formæ lecti, in quibus ſint lineæ nu­
                  <lb/>
                mero pares, ſitu diuerſæ. </s>
                <s id="id.002710">Sit igitur prima A B C D, cuius la­
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <lb/>
                  <figure id="id.035.01.220.1.jpg" xlink:href="035/01/220/1.jpg" number="81"/>
                  <lb/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                tus A B duplum ſit lateris A C, & quidem illud 4. pe­
                  <lb/>
                dum, hoc duorum. </s>
                <s id="id.002711">In hac lora ſecundum diametrum ſint quidem
                  <lb/>
                ſecundum longitudinem tria K N. </s>
                <s id="id.002712">L O, M P, & ſic inter ſe
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>