Gassendi, Pierre, De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur, 1646
page |< < of 360 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001438">
                <pb pagenum="184" xlink:href="028/01/224.jpg"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              E, velocitatis in D?
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Id ſanè non probas, ſed ſolùm
                <lb/>
              ſupponis ex eo vim habere,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              quòd velocitates ſicut spa­
                <lb/>
              tia ſint.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001439"> Atqui hæc ipſa eſt controuerſia,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              an velocita­
                <lb/>
              tes inter ſe ſicut ſpatia ſint:
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              neque idipſum, quod opus
                <lb/>
              eſt, probas, ſed omninò principium petis, ſeu ipſam
                <lb/>
              quæſtionem, remve controuerſam pro principio aſſu­
                <lb/>
              mis. </s>
              <s id="s.001440">An verò dices te probaſſe,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              velocitates eſſe vt ſpa­
                <lb/>
              tia?
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Sed quæſo, vbi-nam? </s>
              <s id="s.001441">Id enim nuſquam de­
                <lb/>
              prehendetur? </s>
              <s id="s.001442">An vbi voluiſti arguere Galileum Pa­
                <lb/>
              ralogiſmi? </s>
              <s id="s.001443">At abundè iam
                <expan abbr="declaratũ">declaratum</expan>
              eſt te potiùs vſum
                <lb/>
              paralogiſmo, cùm rurſus nihil aliud, quàm principium
                <lb/>
              petieris: vt taceam te, ſi quid habuiſti probationis, id­
                <lb/>
              poſteà negaſſe: quando negaſti
                <emph type="italics"/>
              ſi prima pars spatij per­
                <lb/>
              curratur quadrante, percurri ſecundam dimidio quadrantis,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              An vbi demùm protuliſti
                <emph type="italics"/>
              tuum de Bilance Experimen­
                <lb/>
              tum?
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              Certè iſta vna probatio fuit tua, neque potes pro­
                <lb/>
              ferre locum, in quo alia ratione probaueris
                <emph type="italics"/>
              velocitates
                <lb/>
              ſe habere vt spatia.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001444"> Atqui & falſum deprehenſum Ex­
                <lb/>
              perimentum tuum eſt; & quæ germana fuit Experien­
                <lb/>
              tia falſum conuicit
                <emph type="italics"/>
              velocitates ſe inter ſe habere vt
                <lb/>
              spatia.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.001445"> Itaque ex his ſequitur, non modo neceſſe non
                <lb/>
              eſſe: ſed falſum etiam, atque adeò prorsùs impoſſibile,
                <lb/>
              vt
                <emph type="italics"/>
              velocitas in D, dupla ſit velocitatis in S, & velocitas in
                <lb/>
              E, velocitatis in D.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001446">Cùm ergo non modò probatum non ſit, ſed fal­
                <lb/>
              ſum quoque & impoſſibile ipſa Experientia ſuffra­
                <lb/>
              gante oſtenſum,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              velocitatem tota ſecunda parte
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              DE
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              acquiſitam pręcisè duplam eſſe totius velocitatis per inferio­
                <lb/>
              rem primæ partis medietatem
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              SD,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              acquiſitæ, ſimiliterque, &c.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              Quæſo quî adhûc valeas talem ſententiam defendere, </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>