Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001438
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
184
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/224.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
E, velocitatis in D?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Id ſanè non probas, ſed ſolùm
<
lb
/>
ſupponis ex eo vim habere,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
quòd velocitates ſicut spa
<
lb
/>
tia ſint.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001439
"> Atqui hæc ipſa eſt controuerſia,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
an velocita
<
lb
/>
tes inter ſe ſicut ſpatia ſint:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
neque idipſum, quod opus
<
lb
/>
eſt, probas, ſed omninò principium petis, ſeu ipſam
<
lb
/>
quæſtionem, remve controuerſam pro principio aſſu
<
lb
/>
mis. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001440
">An verò dices te probaſſe,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
velocitates eſſe vt ſpa
<
lb
/>
tia?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Sed quæſo, vbi-nam? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001441
">Id enim nuſquam de
<
lb
/>
prehendetur? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001442
">An vbi voluiſti arguere Galileum Pa
<
lb
/>
ralogiſmi? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001443
">At abundè iam
<
expan
abbr
="
declaratũ
">declaratum</
expan
>
eſt te potiùs vſum
<
lb
/>
paralogiſmo, cùm rurſus nihil aliud, quàm principium
<
lb
/>
petieris: vt taceam te, ſi quid habuiſti probationis, id
<
lb
/>
poſteà negaſſe: quando negaſti
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſi prima pars spatij per
<
lb
/>
curratur quadrante, percurri ſecundam dimidio quadrantis,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
An vbi demùm protuliſti
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
tuum de Bilance Experimen
<
lb
/>
tum?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Certè iſta vna probatio fuit tua, neque potes pro
<
lb
/>
ferre locum, in quo alia ratione probaueris
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
velocitates
<
lb
/>
ſe habere vt spatia.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001444
"> Atqui & falſum deprehenſum Ex
<
lb
/>
perimentum tuum eſt; & quæ germana fuit Experien
<
lb
/>
tia falſum conuicit
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
velocitates ſe inter ſe habere vt
<
lb
/>
spatia.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001445
"> Itaque ex his ſequitur, non modo neceſſe non
<
lb
/>
eſſe: ſed falſum etiam, atque adeò prorsùs impoſſibile,
<
lb
/>
vt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
velocitas in D, dupla ſit velocitatis in S, & velocitas in
<
lb
/>
E, velocitatis in D.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001446
">Cùm ergo non modò probatum non ſit, ſed fal
<
lb
/>
ſum quoque & impoſſibile ipſa Experientia ſuffra
<
lb
/>
gante oſtenſum,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
velocitatem tota ſecunda parte
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
DE
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
acquiſitam pręcisè duplam eſſe totius velocitatis per inferio
<
lb
/>
rem primæ partis medietatem
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
SD,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
acquiſitæ, ſimiliterque, &c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Quæſo quî adhûc valeas talem ſententiam defendere, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>