Borro, Girolamo
,
De motu gravium et levium
,
1575
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
Scan
Original
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
page
|<
<
of 316
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
subchap1
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001439
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
205
"
xlink:href
="
011/01/225.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ferro magis aridus, magis rarus, & magis terreus plus trahit
<
lb
/>
humidi, quam reddat: humidum, quod ſuæ naturæ magis fa
<
lb
/>
miliare, & conueniens eſt, magis attrahit: at quoniam fer
<
lb
/>
reum humidum naturæ Herculei lapidis conuenientissimum
<
lb
/>
est, ideo maximè trahitur, & cum tracto ferreo humido, pro
<
lb
/>
pter naturæ cognationem, & formam, etiam ipſum ferrum
<
lb
/>
trahitur: ferrum non item trahit magnetem, quia ferrum
<
lb
/>
minus est peruium, & eam ob cauſam, multam aggregatæ
<
lb
/>
humiditatis cognatam congeriem accipere non poteſt.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001440
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diogenes dicat oportet, cur ſolus Herculeus lapis ferrum
<
lb
/>
tantum trahit, ſi ſola humiditas eſt cauſa propter quam hæc
<
lb
/>
attractio fiat? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001441
">cum alia multa fluida ſint, & ſuo more hu
<
lb
/>
mida, vt est æs, plumbum, & argentum, & cætera, quæ &
<
lb
/>
ipſa propter innatam humiditatem liquantur: magneti hu
<
lb
/>
midæ ob cognatam, & naturæ magnetis maximè conuenien
<
lb
/>
tem humiditatem ſimilia, & à magnete non trahuntur.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001442
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Contra Empedoclem, Democritum, Leucippum, Epicu
<
lb
/>
rum, Lucretium, & Diogenem omnia ferè illa argumenta
<
lb
/>
poſſunt afferri, quæ libro primo de Phyſico auditu particula
<
lb
/>
trigeſimaſexta, & deinceps contra Anaxagoram, ab Ari
<
lb
/>
ſtotele allata fuerunt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001443
">Omnes ex Herculis lapide corporatas
<
lb
/>
effluxiones manare aſſeruerunt: vt Empedocles à mente di
<
lb
/>
uina vnumquodque ex vno quoque extrahi aſſeruit: quapro
<
lb
/>
pter iisdem mediis, quibus Empedocles arguitur, & ipſi ar
<
lb
/>
guuntur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001444
">Omne itaque corpus (vt hinc dicendi principium
<
lb
/>
auſpicemur) aliqua ex parte quantumuis parua truncatum
<
lb
/>
minus quam prius constiterat, efficitur; atqui ex magnete
<
lb
/>
truncatæ partes, quæ corpora ſunt, effluunt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001445
">Ergo magnetis
<
lb
/>
corpus ſemper fit minus, sed magnetem diu ferrum trahere
<
lb
/>
contingit. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001446
">Ergo bona pars corporatarum effluxionum ex ma
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
subchap1
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>