Borro, Girolamo
,
De motu gravium et levium
,
1575
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 316
>
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 316
>
page
|<
<
of 316
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
subchap1
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001446
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
206
"
xlink:href
="
011/01/226.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
gnete diu manare contigit. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001447
">Ergo magnes nunquam non fiet
<
lb
/>
minor: ergo vel ad minimam quantitatem deueniet, ex qua
<
lb
/>
nihil effluet, ac tunc ferrum, quod prius trahebatur amplius
<
lb
/>
non trahetur, vel ſi trahetur, cum non niſi effluxionibus cor
<
lb
/>
poratis ex Herculis lapide manantibus trahatur, opus erit,
<
lb
/>
vt lapis Herculeus minor minimo fiat, & ſi attractio diu du
<
lb
/>
ret, lapis tandem conſumetur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001448
">Quod ſi lapis Herculeus par
<
lb
/>
ticularum
<
expan
abbr
="
cõtinuo
">continuo</
expan
>
effluxu non conſumatur, cum tempus nec
<
lb
/>
ſui ortus principium habeat, nec finem ſit habiturum, vt Ari
<
lb
/>
stoteles octauo Phyſicorum efficacissimè demonstrat, tempo
<
lb
/>
re infinito ferrum à magnete trahi contingerit; & est ma
<
lb
/>
gnetis corpus finitum, ex quo infinito tempore infinitæ particu
<
lb
/>
læ effluent. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001449
">Ergo in corpore finito infinities infinitæ particulæ
<
lb
/>
erunt. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001450
">At ſi magnetis paruum illud fruſtulum paruum fer
<
lb
/>
ri fruſtulum non traxerit: ergo nec totus magnus Herculeus
<
lb
/>
lapis trahebat, quia totum præditum eſt partibus
<
expan
abbr
="
conſimiliũ
">conſimilium</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
rationum: quapropter ſi totum trahit, & qualibet totius par
<
lb
/>
ticula trahet; ſi vna particula non trahit, nec totum trahet,
<
lb
/>
quæ omnia præter quam, quod fieri non poſſunt, ſunt
<
expan
abbr
="
etiã
">etiam</
expan
>
tam
<
lb
/>
falſa quam falſissima, & tam abſurda quam abſurdissima.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001451
">Hic antiquorum Democriti præſertim trahendi modus, vt ru
<
lb
/>
dis, atque ineptus à Galeno libro primo de naturalibus facul
<
lb
/>
tatibus, & non raro alibi, grauiter & acutè refellitur: cuius
<
lb
/>
argumenta nos intacta derelinquimus; ne quæstionis huius
<
lb
/>
explicandus exitus diutius differatur, & ad rem noſtram
<
lb
/>
reuertimur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001452
">Ideo aliter reſpondeo, & certè melius. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001453
">Ferrum
<
lb
/>
propria forma vacat, à qua ad Herculeum lapidem mouea
<
lb
/>
tur, ideo à magnete omnino immoto trahitur, beneficio tamen
<
lb
/>
ſpecierum quorumdam tenuium,
<
expan
abbr
="
nõ
">non</
expan
>
corporatorum, vt veteres
<
lb
/>
illi philoſophi, quorum mentionem ſupra feci, aſſeruerunt, sed
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
subchap1
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>