Newton, Isaac, Philosophia naturalis principia mathematica, 1713

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
< >
page |< < of 524 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="039/01/023.jpg"/>
              metarum prorſus regulari, nullam ipſos reſiſtentiam pati quæ vel
                <lb/>
              minimum ſentiri poteſt; atque adeo neutiquam in materiam ul­
                <lb/>
              lam incurſare, cujus aliqua ſit vis reſiſtendi, vel proinde cujus ali­
                <lb/>
              qua ſit denſitas ſeu vis Inertiæ. </s>
              <s>Nam reſiſtentia Mediorum ori­
                <lb/>
              tur vel ab inertia materiæ fluidæ, vel a defectu lubricitatis. </s>
              <s>Quæ
                <lb/>
              oritur a defectu lubricitatis, admodum exigua eſt; & ſane vix
                <lb/>
              obſervari poteſt in Fluidis vulgo notis, niſi valde tenacia fuerint
                <lb/>
              adinſtar Olei & Mellis. </s>
              <s>Reſiſtentia quæ ſentitur in Aere, Aqua,
                <lb/>
              Hydrargyro, & hujuſmodi Fluidis non tenacibus fere tota eſt
                <lb/>
              prioris generis; & minui non poteſt per ulteriorem quemcunque
                <lb/>
              gradum ſubtilitatis, manente Fluidi denſitate vel vi inertiæ, cui
                <lb/>
              ſemper proportionalis eſt hæc reſiſtentia; quemadmodum clariſ­
                <lb/>
              ſime demonſtratum eſt ab Auctore noſtro in peregregia Reſiſten­
                <lb/>
              tiarum Theoria, quæ paulo nunc accuratius exponitur, hac ſe­
                <lb/>
              cunda vice, & per Experimenta corporum cadentium plenius
                <lb/>
              confirmatur. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>Corpora progrediendo motum ſuum Fluido ambienti paulatim
                <lb/>
              communicant, & communicando amittunt, amittendo autem re­
                <lb/>
              tardantur. </s>
              <s>Eſt itaque retardatio motui communicato proportio­
                <lb/>
              nalis; motus vero communicatus, ubi datur corporis progredientis
                <lb/>
              velocitas, eſt ut Fluidi denſitas; ergo retardatio ſeu reſiſtentia
                <lb/>
              erit ut eadem Fluidi denſitas; neque ullo pacto tolli poteſt, niſi
                <lb/>
              a Fluido ad partes corporis poſticas recurrente reſtituatur motus
                <lb/>
              amiſſus. </s>
              <s>Hoc autem dici non poterit, niſi impreſſio Fluidi in cor­
                <lb/>
              pus ad partes poſticas æqualis fuerit impreſſioni corporis in Flui­
                <lb/>
              dum ad partes anticas, hoc eſt, niſi velocitas relativa qua Flui­
                <lb/>
              dum irruit in corpus a tergo, æqualis fuerit velocitati qua cor­
                <lb/>
              pus irruit in Fluidum, id eſt, niſi velocitas abſoluta Fluidi re­
                <lb/>
              currentis duplo major fuerit quam velocitas abſoluta Fluidi pro­
                <lb/>
              pulſi; quod fieri nequit. </s>
              <s>Nullo igitur modo tolli poteſt Flui­
                <lb/>
              dorum reſiſtentia, quæ oritur ab corundem denſitate & vi in­
                <lb/>
              ertiæ. </s>
              <s>Itaque concludendum erit; Fluidi cæleſtis nullam eſſe
                <lb/>
              vim inertiæ, cum nulla ſit vis reſiſtendi: nullam eſſe vim qua
                <lb/>
              motus communicetur, cum nulla ſit vis inertiæ: nullam eſſe vim
                <lb/>
              qua mutatio quælibet vel corporibus ſingulis vel pluribus indu­
                <lb/>
              catur, cum nulla ſit vis qua motus communicetur: nullam eſſe
                <lb/>
              omnino efficaciam, cum nulla ſit facultas mutationem quamlibet
                <lb/>
              inducendi. </s>
              <s>Quidni ergo hanc Hypotheſin, quæ fundamento
                <lb/>
              plane deſtituitur, quæque naturæ rerum explicandæ ne minimum
                <lb/>
              quidem inſervit, ineptiſſimam vocare liceat & Philoſopho pror-</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>